1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Lakers New Regional TV Network - NOW ON THE AIR

Discussion in 'DIRECTV Programming' started by kb24sd, Jul 1, 2012.

  1. Oct 2, 2012 #521 of 2097
    Hoosier205

    Hoosier205 Active Member

    6,659
    14
    Sep 3, 2007
    I just wonder how long it will take Lakers executives to grow impatient with TWC for not signing distribution deals.
     
  2. Oct 2, 2012 #522 of 2097
    DBSNewbie

    DBSNewbie Icon

    807
    0
    Nov 3, 2007
    Yes. That is true. NBA TV games are blacked-out here in Los Angeles (if I recall correctly) depending on whether or not it's a home or away game for the Lakers. I seem to remember being able to see some Lakers games in the past, but not others.

    EDIT: I just remembered which instances in which NBA TV would black out Laker games in L.A. It depends on which "feed" (ie. FSN West, FSN Northwest, CSN-California, etc.) NBA-TV would be showing on their channel. If it was one of our local stations (KCAL-9 or FSN), then it would not be blacked out in Los Angeles, but if it were of the other team's broadcast, then it would be blacked out here in L.A.

    So, assuming that those are the rules regarding black-outs, then I would imagine that the Oct. 31st game on NBA-TV would be available to NBA-TV viewers in the Lakers DMA if the "feed" NBA-TV is carrying was coming from TWC-SN and not CSN-Portland (or whichever TV station the Blazers use).

    I think that would give TWC a perfect opportunity to "showcase" their product and put some pressure on TV service providers to carry TWC-SN.
     
  3. Oct 2, 2012 #523 of 2097
    inkahauts

    inkahauts Well-Known Member

    22,661
    1,102
    Nov 13, 2006
    Pac12 is full time Hi Definition.
     
  4. Oct 2, 2012 #524 of 2097
    inkahauts

    inkahauts Well-Known Member

    22,661
    1,102
    Nov 13, 2006
    I don't know, they likely want close to all games but there is a big difference when you consider there are twice as many games, and probably half as many on national tv, so there are so many more games.... Taking on a partner, even if it where only for the first half of the season might to make some sense. They could also always go the overflow channel route...
     
  5. Oct 2, 2012 #525 of 2097
    Curtis0620

    Curtis0620 Hall Of Fame

    1,497
    24
    Apr 22, 2002
    On DISH?
     
  6. Oct 2, 2012 #526 of 2097
    inkahauts

    inkahauts Well-Known Member

    22,661
    1,102
    Nov 13, 2006
    Who cares about how dish is doing it? I am saying if DirecTV carries it they would make it full time, so dish can pound sound...
     
  7. Oct 2, 2012 #527 of 2097
    Curtis0620

    Curtis0620 Hall Of Fame

    1,497
    24
    Apr 22, 2002
    Isn't this why they claim to be the New Sports leader. The most Part Time Sports in HD.
     
  8. Oct 2, 2012 #528 of 2097
    DBSNewbie

    DBSNewbie Icon

    807
    0
    Nov 3, 2007

    Very good points.

    By the way, the YES Network carries both Yankees (MLB) and Nets (NBA). Does anyone know how they handle overlapping games? Do either the Yankees or Nets have a local TV partner or affiliate? Or are all games, basketball and baseball, exclusively all on YES? (excluding national broadcasts, such as the ones on ESPN, of course)
     
  9. Oct 2, 2012 #529 of 2097
    sigma1914

    sigma1914 Well-Known Member DBSTalk Club

    14,602
    372
    Sep 5, 2006
    Allen, TX
    It doesn't matter...ESPN games are never blacked out.
     
  10. Oct 2, 2012 #530 of 2097
    maartena

    maartena Hall Of Fame

    2,828
    9
    Nov 1, 2010
    The station ITSELF is 24/7 HD. All 7 networks are. Cable providers mostly carry at least 2 of those in full time HD (the national and the local).

    Dish carries just the NATIONAL network as full time HD, and has extra feeds for games not shown on the national network.
     
  11. Oct 2, 2012 #531 of 2097
    maartena

    maartena Hall Of Fame

    2,828
    9
    Nov 1, 2010
    ESPN games are never blacked out. As a matter of fact, when the Angels or Dodgers play on ESPN, it is the Fox Sports feed that is blacked out, so it is the other way around. (I noticed this when I tuned in to 692 one night for an Angels game and was confronted with a blackout.... took me a few moments to realize the game was on ESPN). This is one of the reasons ESPN is so expensive by the way, when they buy rights to a game they buy it for the entire country, no blackouts.

    You'll get all ESPN, ABC, TNT games. The only games that might be subject to a blackout is NBA TV, but if TWC has not signed deals with *anyone* I wouldn't be surprised the NBA is allowed to show the game. We'll have to wait and see.
     
  12. Oct 2, 2012 #532 of 2097
    Eksynyt

    Eksynyt Icon

    870
    11
    Feb 8, 2008
    Well, they're certainly the college sports leader. 2 Pac 12 football games a week are completely unavailable to DirecTV subscribers...it's a travesty that the suits at DirecTV are putting their own financial desires ahead of what their customers want. I hope they lose a ton of people over it.
     
  13. Oct 2, 2012 #533 of 2097
    Hoosier205

    Hoosier205 Active Member

    6,659
    14
    Sep 3, 2007
    No they are not. DirecTV offers far more college sports.
     
  14. Oct 2, 2012 #534 of 2097
    Bambler

    Bambler Legend

    412
    16
    May 30, 2006
    Well, regardless of whether they are the "sports leader" or not, the landscape is changing IMO. Other providers are seeing cracks in DirecTV's sports armor and they're obviously going after it, who wouldn't if you were sitting in the president's office of Comcast, Dish or whomever? I would.

    I bet things are much different once contracts start coming up for renewal. Considering DirecTV's seemingly new stance, while other providers are willing and all too eager to take up and distribute any sports programming they can grab, the tide is slowly shifting and five years from now things could be totally different.
     
  15. Oct 2, 2012 #535 of 2097
    tonyd79

    tonyd79 Hall Of Fame

    12,971
    204
    Jul 24, 2006
    Columbia, MD
    Or not.

    We haven't seen them play hardball with any sports renewals yet.

    Only place they have on renewal was Viacom and that was pretty obvious what Viacom was trying to do. And they settled within days.
     
  16. Oct 2, 2012 #536 of 2097
    kappat

    kappat New Member

    6
    0
    Feb 22, 2008
    There is a lot of discussion in this thread about whether DirecTV is the "sports leader." Some say yes and others are now saying no. You have to look at how they are defining what sports leader means to them. For some, it is defined by the total amount of sports shown on DirecTV. For others, it is defined by the ability to watch their favorite teams. Currently in L.A, you cannot watch Lakers, Sparks, Galaxy, USC, and UCLA unless the game is on a national channel.

    Yes, DirecTV is the sports leader because they show the most sports, but the claim falls short on a personal level when you can't watch your favorite teams.
     
  17. Oct 2, 2012 #537 of 2097
    Satelliteracer

    Satelliteracer Hall Of Fame

    3,042
    37
    Dec 6, 2006
    It's not driven by market, driven by zip code. Pricing for RSNs is subject to the zip code. So you can have two customers in the same market, but in one zip code the rate D* pays the RSN is X while another customer in the same market but different zip code D* has to pay RSN X *5 as an example. Example purposes only, but that's how that stuff works. Territories are carved out by zip codes, not by DMA. A good way to explain this is the Lakers territory which goes to Vegas, Hawaii, up to Santa Barbara, down to San Diego, etc, but the rates are different even within a DMA.
     
  18. Oct 2, 2012 #538 of 2097
    Bambler

    Bambler Legend

    412
    16
    May 30, 2006
    I wouldn't call the PAC-12 network negotiations soft by any means and I would probably be wise to guess the TWC stalemate will go on well into the season as well, if it ever gets signed at all this year.

    It probably pains DirecTV to have to sign on the dotted line of their competitor, empowering them as much or even more than DirecTV. I probably wouldn't sign either, but that still doesn't negate the high probability that in five year's time, DirecTV's sports position will be compromised, as it's already slipping in my eyes.
     
  19. Oct 2, 2012 #539 of 2097
    TravelFan1

    TravelFan1 Legend

    233
    9
    Apr 1, 2009
    Yes has an alternate feed. A few Yankees games are carried on channel 9. In the past, there had been Nets games in April/may that were also carried by channel 9 - I remembered one season finale Veronica Mars episode shown in ny like 1am because of the Nets. I don't know if channel 9 will carry any games next spring, though.
     
  20. Oct 2, 2012 #540 of 2097
    HoTat2

    HoTat2 Hall Of Fame

    7,309
    185
    Nov 16, 2005
    Los...
    Though how much is attributed to the cost of sports programming is not indicated;

    http://techcrunch.com/2012/10/01/pay-tv-train-wreck/

    Still yea, as the article says, "something's gotta give." DIRECTV's programming cost have grown some 32% over the past five years. :eek2:

    From "Bernstein Research" analyst Craig Moffett;

    [​IMG]

    Its no wonder they're stalling on adding the Pac 12 and TWC SporstNet along with experiencing a constant stream of disputes with the non-sports program providers and OTA station groups.
     

Share This Page