Lifetime channels removed from E*

Discussion in 'General DISH™ Discussion' started by MikeW, Dec 31, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Jan 2, 2006 #121 of 324
    juan ellitinez

    juan ellitinez Icon/Supporter DBSTalk Gold Club

    1,982
    0
    Jan 31, 2003
    I guess you havent "felt the joy" with the r15:p
     
  2. Jan 2, 2006 #122 of 324
    Steve Mehs

    Steve Mehs Hall Of Fame

    11,498
    5
    Mar 21, 2002
    Why should I when I have the best DVRs on the planet, a Philips DSR704 and DirecTV R10 :)
     
  3. Jan 3, 2006 #123 of 324
    Nick

    Nick Retired, part-time PITA DBSTalk Club

    22,027
    262
    Apr 23, 2002
    The...
  4. Jan 3, 2006 #124 of 324
    ehren

    ehren Hall Of Fame

    1,179
    0
    Aug 2, 2003
    what a cheap bastard, Encore Love is only available with a subscription to a higher tier package? What's the point of having the channel? And are people too lazy to hit 1-2-8 on the remote to watch WE?
     
  5. Jan 3, 2006 #125 of 324
    BoisePaul

    BoisePaul Godfather

    322
    0
    Apr 26, 2005
    Encore Love is being substituted for Lifetime Movie Network. As LMN was only available in AT120 or higher, such is the same for Encore Love. If you were able to previously receive LMN, you now see the replacement channel.
     
  6. Jan 3, 2006 #126 of 324
    KingLoop

    KingLoop Custom User Title DBSTalk Gold Club

    886
    0
    Mar 3, 2005
    I think that it is all relative as to which package you want and how many receivers you want. An argument could be made to subscribe to either service with any package. I agree that D* has a generally better programming value, but AT180 to new subs would be $55/mth for 2 TVs and TC Plus would be $51/mth. Many people think that the encore channels and 2 TMCs are worth 4 more bucks, also if you have 4 T.V.'s with independent viewing with E* you would pay $60/mth and with D* $61. I think that it is a case by case basis to determine what is best for whom.

    In my opinion, D* has lifetime right now and E* doesn't. That is a deal breaker. I would miss TNTHD though, but not more than my wife misses lifetime. I'm gonna be $400 out of pocket to get switched over, but that is a lot less than I have spent on my E* IRDS, and I figure if I sell my E* stuff and get $300 in D* rebates I'll fair pretty well with the transition.

    Bottom line, Charlie has about a week (maybe 2) to get this fixed before I switch. Right now I am at $77/mth with E*, with D* I would be at $85/mth and I will lose TNTHD (but get universal, I don't think that is a good trade though), HBO Comedy, and my Sirius music. I will pick up Lifetime Real Women for the wife and Oxygen, and will pick up XM. So for me it's a bad move for my TV enjoyment, but my wife will be happier.
     
  7. Jan 3, 2006 #127 of 324
    Link

    Link Hall Of Fame

    1,804
    4
    Feb 1, 2004
    I guess the dual tuner receivers with Dish is one thing to consider. Also, getting HBO/Cinemax for $17 is a good deal. On Directv the price is $23 for HBO/Cinemax and you only get 2 Cinemax channels and one west feed while Dish has 4 Cinemax channels and one west feed.

    Also that is what keeps basic cable service popular since you can have it on as many TVs without extra outlet fees.
     
  8. Jan 3, 2006 #128 of 324
    the_bear

    the_bear Godfather

    420
    0
    Oct 18, 2004
    I can just see the a la carte choices now. ESPN/Lifetime1 will be geared toward women during the day and men at night. Then there will be ESPN/Lifetime2 that will be geared toward men during the day and women at night. If you want to watch both games, you will need to buy both channels.


    I don’t see this as about picking sides E vs. Lifetime. These press releases seem useless. It is simply about getting the best service at the lowest price. How to get us that is Charlie’s problem to solve.
     
  9. Jan 3, 2006 #129 of 324
    Jacob S

    Jacob S Hall Of Fame

    7,657
    1
    Apr 14, 2002
    I wonder how many subscribers have been lost so far?
     
  10. Jan 3, 2006 #130 of 324
    Jacob S

    Jacob S Hall Of Fame

    7,657
    1
    Apr 14, 2002
    When they take the free preview channels off there are going to be a lot of angry customers if they don't have the Lifetime channels back by then.
     
  11. Jan 3, 2006 #131 of 324
    johnbelt28

    johnbelt28 AllStar

    61
    0
    Nov 6, 2004
    I don't know about that but judging from message boards this is going to have a bigger backlash than the Viacom fiasco.People are just tired of Charlie's antics.He does this to save us money is so laughable.Next years increase 3-4 dollars Lifetime or no Lifetime.
     
  12. Jan 3, 2006 #132 of 324
    the_bear

    the_bear Godfather

    420
    0
    Oct 18, 2004
    If your estimate is correct, Lifetime loses $6M by not signing a new contract with E. I just don’t see E losing $21M worth of subs over this deal. I know other people have implied that Charlie is negotiating from a position of weakness, but I don’t see it that way. It is always interesting seeing these deals negotiated, because it costs Lifetime very little to be added to E, so it is an almost pure profit transition for them. But then again, if Lifetime gave every service provider a good deal, they would be off the air. I would be willing to bet there are huge discrepancies between what providers pay for channels.
     
  13. Jan 3, 2006 #133 of 324
    GeorgeLV

    GeorgeLV Godfather

    359
    0
    Jan 1, 2006
    For 2004 the average monthly revenue per subscriber for Dish Network was $54.87. Annualized that's $658.44. $21,000,000 / $658.44 = 31,894 subscibers. That means that less than three-tenths of one percent of Echostar's 11 million or so subscribers need to leave for Charlie to take the bigger loss.
     
  14. Jan 3, 2006 #134 of 324
    the_bear

    the_bear Godfather

    420
    0
    Oct 18, 2004
    $21M doesn’t look so big, when you put it in %. I still don’t see 3/10% canceling, but it could happen.
     
  15. Jan 3, 2006 #135 of 324
    Jacob S

    Jacob S Hall Of Fame

    7,657
    1
    Apr 14, 2002
    0.3% = 360,000 subscribers = 1 out of 333 subscribers. If there was that kind of a loss in subscribers we would find out when we get the quarterly totals. That is about the amount of gain that Dish Network gets. I am thinking that Dish Network does all of these figures to see if they stand to lose more than they gain by taking the channel off.
     
  16. Jan 3, 2006 #136 of 324
    LtMunst

    LtMunst Hall Of Fame

    1,267
    3
    Aug 24, 2005

    3/10% is a lowball number. If I check in on my wife it's 50/50 she's watching lifetime. Go over mom's house 75/25 she's watching lifetime. I stop over grandma's house, 90%.

    I have no reason to believe the females of my family are too different in their viewing habits than the average female. This could be a HUGE blow to E* if it does not get resolved in a reasonable amount of time.
     
  17. Jan 3, 2006 #137 of 324
    dwcobb

    dwcobb AllStar

    81
    0
    Oct 12, 2005
    If Lifetime is really the 8th ranked station as one of the earlier posts suggested, it could easily be 3/10 of a percent canceling to go to a provider that has the channel.

    Again, my bigger concern in all this is that this is the third time E* has done (or been on the verge of doing) something like this recently - Viacom, OLN, Lifetime. The only comment element in there is E*. And you don't see other providers going through the same sturm and drang for contract renewals.

    It is a really bad pattern E8* needs to break.
     
  18. Jan 3, 2006 #138 of 324
    juan ellitinez

    juan ellitinez Icon/Supporter DBSTalk Gold Club

    1,982
    0
    Jan 31, 2003
    not true Time warner dropped amc classic last year in a dispute with cablevision... Cable does it ALL the time . E* just has a much larger NATIONAL presence
     
  19. Jan 3, 2006 #139 of 324
    GeorgeLV

    GeorgeLV Godfather

    359
    0
    Jan 1, 2006
    You're right, I meant three-hundredths of a percent.
     
  20. Jan 3, 2006 #140 of 324
    Paul Secic

    Paul Secic Hall Of Fame

    6,226
    23
    Dec 16, 2003
    I agree. Lifetime just has made for TV movies don't they? I don't thnk its worth an increase. I wrote to ceo@echostar.com & said negotiate with Oxygen & Ovation.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

spam firewall