1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

MLB blackouts!

Discussion in 'DIRECTV Programming' started by millertime, Sep 2, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Sep 2, 2007 #1 of 26
    millertime

    millertime Godfather

    370
    1
    Sep 2, 2007
    Can someone explain the blackout thing for me. The tigers are on 636 sd and channel 95 has the hd version. This happens alot and everytime it says this program not available in your area. I don't get it!!!!
     
  2. Sep 2, 2007 #2 of 26
    cariera

    cariera Icon

    863
    1
    Oct 27, 2006
    The Tigers are usually available for you watch in the following priority order:

    1. Local Channels
    2. Your RSN (636 in this case)
    3. National Channels (such as ESPN)

    The Tigers game today is on FSN Bay Area, which is not your RSN. You will never get a Tigers game in your area from the other team's RSN, even with MLBEI.

    So the reason you don't get to see the game in HD on 95 is because you don't get FSNBA (654) and even if you got it as part of the sports pack, all pro baseball games would be blacked out.

    Hope that helps:)
     
  3. Sep 2, 2007 #3 of 26
    Lord Vader

    Lord Vader Supreme Member DBSTalk Club

    8,761
    42
    Sep 20, 2004
    Galactic Empire
    Once again, I stress that DirecTV customers should NOT be blacked out of ANYthing if a sports package is exclusive to D* itself. The NFL Sunday Ticket is exclusive to D*. MLB EI is virtually exclusive to D*. If we as D* customers are paying good money--and we are, especially for the Sunday Ticket--then we should receive as a privilege the right to watch any of the games with no blackouts.
     
  4. Sep 2, 2007 #4 of 26
    FLWingNut

    FLWingNut Godfather

    471
    12
    Nov 19, 2005
    Off topic (a little), I tried to watch yesterday's A's-Tigers game on mlb.tv and it was blacked out there. My FOX affiliate was showing Mets-Braves, so I thought I could get my game on mlb.tv. Uh....nope.

    What am I paying for again?
     
  5. Sep 2, 2007 #5 of 26
    Redlinetire

    Redlinetire Icon

    927
    0
    Jul 24, 2007
    The various leagues own the rights and they alone decide what is broadcast and what is blacked out.

    It has nothing to do with D*....
     
  6. Sep 2, 2007 #6 of 26
    Lord Vader

    Lord Vader Supreme Member DBSTalk Club

    8,761
    42
    Sep 20, 2004
    Galactic Empire
    I know that, but that's not my point. If DirecTV is willing to pony up bucks to make a sports package exclusive, then their customers, who are paying substantial dollars to watch said programming, ought to be able to be exempt from such league-imposed blackouts. The NFL, MLB, et. al. should understand this.
     
  7. Sep 2, 2007 #7 of 26
    bwaldron

    bwaldron Impossible Dreamer

    5,525
    0
    Oct 24, 2005
    No, it isn't.

    Not that I disagree with the sentiment behind your statements regarding blackouts.
     
  8. Sep 2, 2007 #8 of 26
    Redlinetire

    Redlinetire Icon

    927
    0
    Jul 24, 2007
    I would guess that 'exemptions' would violate the contracts that they've signed with RSNs, since I'm assuming that those involve exclusivity to broadcast. And they're not about to try to renegotiate all of those...

    And since when does paying large amounts of money gain you anything but the vote of a politician?? !rolling
     
  9. Sep 2, 2007 #9 of 26
    Lord Vader

    Lord Vader Supreme Member DBSTalk Club

    8,761
    42
    Sep 20, 2004
    Galactic Empire
    Yes it is, which is why I intentionally chose the word "virtually." But that's rather irrelevant here anyway.
     
  10. Lord Vader

    Lord Vader Supreme Member DBSTalk Club

    8,761
    42
    Sep 20, 2004
    Galactic Empire
    MLB has final say on broadcast rights, even when RSN's come into play.
     
  11. rjdude

    rjdude Legend

    203
    0
    Mar 8, 2005
    The MLB owners met earlier this year and discussed all of the complaints regarding blackouts and hopefully they'll do a better job of handling these broadcast issues going forward (next year and beyond). It'll be a mute point as more and more games are broadcast in HD (both local broadcasts and opponent's broadcasts). The NFL has more control of the broadcast rights (the games are typically carried on local national networks or ESPN -- and there are far fewer games overall versus baseball). Many baseball teams have complicated broadcast rights with local RSNs, local channels, etc. and MLB does not have as much control over these broadcasts.
     
  12. bwaldron

    bwaldron Impossible Dreamer

    5,525
    0
    Oct 24, 2005
    Still don't see what you mean. As a result of all the wailing and gnashing of teeth earlier this year, it's available on many cable systems across the nation...not exclusive to D*. Now if one were to live in an area whose cable system doesn't carry it, then sure it is "exclusive" to D* there. Unless you watch the online version -- which also has the blackout restrictions.
     
  13. raoul5788

    raoul5788 Guest

    1,481
    0
    May 13, 2006
    Look up the word "virtually".
     
  14. tonyd79

    tonyd79 Hall Of Fame

    12,971
    204
    Jul 24, 2006
    Columbia, MD
    No, they don't.

    Right now, teams own local rights to games. It could change but MLB has national distribution rights, internet rights and satellite radio rights. The only one that doesn't recognize local rights is satellite radio, which is the latest to be set up.

    That shows a desire by MLB to not protect local rights on national distribution systems but the contracts for local TV and radio (which includes internet TV) have to be rewritten and that will take time as there are dozens of them.
     
  15. cariera

    cariera Icon

    863
    1
    Oct 27, 2006
    Anyone remember the disclaimer that used to procede all MLB broadcasts back in the day, either on radio or tv? It went something like this:

    "Any retransmission, rebroadcast or accounts of this game without the express written consent of Major League Baseball, or the (insert local team name here) is prohibited"

    As rjdude has stated earlier, MLB is aware of the concern and hopefully they will find a way to give the baseball fan access to all the games without restrictions.
     
  16. rjdude

    rjdude Legend

    203
    0
    Mar 8, 2005
    maybe that's why they haven't started the "MLB" channel (ala the NFL or NBA channels). They probably couldn't carry any of the broadcasts because of all of the tanglements. If they can figure out how to start up that channel with broadcast rights, then maybe they can figure out the whole national mess.
     
  17. millertime

    millertime Godfather

    370
    1
    Sep 2, 2007
    So if fsn detroit was broadcasting the game in hd would I then be able to watch it on ch.95?
     
  18. rjdude

    rjdude Legend

    203
    0
    Mar 8, 2005
    Depends. If another local channel has broadcast rights (even if they decide NOT to carry the game), then the HD feed on channel 94/95 will be blocked. If no local channel has the rights, but D* decides to carry the HD feed from the opposing team (aka Yankees) and not the Detroit broadcast, then you probably won't get the game in HD because your local RSN wants you to watch their SD version.
     
  19. Lord Vader

    Lord Vader Supreme Member DBSTalk Club

    8,761
    42
    Sep 20, 2004
    Galactic Empire
    Yes, they do. Any transmission rights negotiated by local teams needs final approval from the MLB office.
     
  20. rjdude

    rjdude Legend

    203
    0
    Mar 8, 2005
    ...but I believe that's just a formality! The big teams (think big markets) have a lot of money and power.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page