1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Mysterious DVR on Whole Home through DECA

Discussion in 'DIRECTV General Discussion' started by ZandarKoad, Dec 6, 2012.

  1. Dec 6, 2012 #1 of 15
    ZandarKoad

    ZandarKoad Mentor

    114
    4
    Oct 25, 2009
    I'm totally stumped on this one guys. I've got a service call today that I've been trying to fix for three days, and I can't figure it out. I feel like I'm working for Dish Network again. :D

    SO, what happens is whenever the customer connects his (non-wireless) cinema connection kit (DECA) into his internet, another DVR shows up on his whole home network. The DVR has the name 356527. This DVR has it's own set of recordings, which will show up in his list. Moreover, while he can delete these items, SOMEONE ELSE CAN ALSO DELETE HIS ITEMS, and does so at random. It's almost like he's getting connected to someone else's account through the cinema connection kit! :eek2: When he disconnects the DECA kit, all problems disappear. His to-do list is not affected at all.

    He has one HR24, two H25s, he's in a single family home, no other DVRs listed on his account (I verified through corporate), no other IRDs on the coax network. The ONLY INTERNET DEVICE IN HIS HOME is the DECA kit, and he STILL has the same problems. His internet provider is the local power company, so he doesn't even need a modem - he plugs an ethernet straight into the wall jack for internet - NO ROUTER OR SWITCH. Though he has tried using both a wireless router and a switch, to no avail.

    I'm going out there today to replace his DVR since I have no clue what else to do. I don't think that will fix it, and neither does the customer, but what more can a tech do???

    Any ideas? :confused:
     
  2. Dec 6, 2012 #2 of 15
    Billzebub

    Billzebub Godfather

    793
    46
    Jan 1, 2007
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Is it possible he has a neighbor who has found his way (via wireless) onto his network?

    Sorry, I should have read the whole post. It might be possible that he has a neighbor with teh same internet service and their networks somehow got mixed together.
     
  3. Dec 6, 2012 #3 of 15
    ebox4greg

    ebox4greg AllStar

    66
    0
    Dec 2, 2012
    Weird configuration. I never heard of internet coming into a house with no kind of modem or router.........
     
  4. Dec 6, 2012 #4 of 15
    veryoldschool

    veryoldschool Lifetime Achiever Staff Member Super Moderator DBSTalk Club

    42,684
    349
    Dec 9, 2006
    A switch isn't going to do any good, but a router should.

    One of this customer's neighbors also has DirecTV and without a router, the two customers are sharing through the power line network.
    You will see the same thing with apartments on a SWiM and no BSF, or in a single home where most are on DECA and another is wired through their router.
    "I imagine" when the wireless router was tried, the ethernet had the outbound cable connected to the inside ports, thus is was only acting like a switch.
     
  5. Dec 6, 2012 #5 of 15
    kevinturcotte

    kevinturcotte Active Member

    3,957
    1
    Dec 19, 2006
    Outside...
    I would think then a simply BSF where the Directv cable enters the home would fix this right? However, I agree, I'd definitely want a router with a good firewall turned on. If neighbors can see what's on their Directv receivers, no reason to think they can't see EVERYTHING that's connected to the internet.
     
  6. Dec 6, 2012 #6 of 15
    veryoldschool

    veryoldschool Lifetime Achiever Staff Member Super Moderator DBSTalk Club

    42,684
    349
    Dec 9, 2006
    Doesn't sound like this is a coax bridging issue.
     
  7. Dec 6, 2012 #7 of 15
    Doug Brott

    Doug Brott Lifetime Achiever DBSTalk Club

    28,939
    72
    Jul 12, 2006
    Los Angeles
    Since there is Ethernet directly into the house, a router is needed. The WAN port on the router will plug into the power company connection and the LAN port will be where the DECA device attaches. That should solve the problem.
     
  8. Dec 6, 2012 #8 of 15
    kevinturcotte

    kevinturcotte Active Member

    3,957
    1
    Dec 19, 2006
    Outside...
    I would think. Just make sure firewalls are tuned on, and lock down wireless with WPA2.
     
  9. Dec 6, 2012 #9 of 15
    Doug Brott

    Doug Brott Lifetime Achiever DBSTalk Club

    28,939
    72
    Jul 12, 2006
    Los Angeles
    It doesn't have to be a wireless router.
     
  10. kevinturcotte

    kevinturcotte Active Member

    3,957
    1
    Dec 19, 2006
    Outside...
    No, it doesn't have to be a wireless. At this point, I'd get a wireless though because more and more devices are becoming wireless only. Might as well "Future Proof" (As much as you can anyway lol) if you can.
     
  11. JosephB

    JosephB Icon

    1,399
    46
    Nov 14, 2005
    Birmingham, AL
    He should contact his ISP. With a cable or DSL provider, your individual segment of the network (from the modem inward) would be logically separated from all of your neighbors. Sounds like the local power company has just dumped everyone on one big subnet. This is a bigger issue than his DVR, that also means that others theoretically could see other traffic from his network or probe other devices like computers, etc. Must be a small co-op or municipal utility to screw up that bad.
     
  12. veryoldschool

    veryoldschool Lifetime Achiever Staff Member Super Moderator DBSTalk Club

    42,684
    349
    Dec 9, 2006
    About 15 years ago, I had an early cable modem internet.
    They had the same problem.
    They used static IPs and you could find all the computers in the neighborhood running off the same fiber node.
    Windows networking would even let me into some and copy files. :eek2:
     
  13. ZandarKoad

    ZandarKoad Mentor

    114
    4
    Oct 25, 2009
    Doug,that solved the problem. You win money. Or at least my gratitude.
     
  14. rmmccann

    rmmccann AllStar

    330
    20
    Apr 16, 2012
    ND, USA
    Although I completely agree that the ISP doesn't have things set up the way they should, at some point you have to remember that it's not the ISP that's responsible for your security, it's you.
     
  15. JosephB

    JosephB Icon

    1,399
    46
    Nov 14, 2005
    Birmingham, AL
    Oh, no doubt. Even with ISP segmenting networks appropriately, you are still exposed to the internet without a firewall. However, the ISP is still misconfigured and someone should let them know. Imagine how many of their customers don't have a situation like this arise or don't know any better.
     

Share This Page