NFL reportedly considering proposal to eliminate extra points

Discussion in 'Sports Programming and Events' started by fluffybear, Jan 21, 2014.

  1. fluffybear

    fluffybear Hall Of Fame

    7,316
    38
    Jun 19, 2004
    Peachtree...
    Exactly! it is such an unfair advantage for the team which wins the OT coin toss..
     
  2. fluffybear

    fluffybear Hall Of Fame

    7,316
    38
    Jun 19, 2004
    Peachtree...
    Yes, it reduces the hurry up offense but it also means the team in the lead will actually have to do something more than just drop to a knee and wait for the clock to run out.
     
  3. inkahauts

    inkahauts Well-Known Member

    24,720
    1,476
    Nov 13, 2006
    It really would give the advantage to the team that is behind only.
     
  4. fluffybear

    fluffybear Hall Of Fame

    7,316
    38
    Jun 19, 2004
    Peachtree...
    The team which is leading has been getting the advantage for years, it might be time to change sides and give that advantage to the team which is behind..
     
  5. Stewart Vernon

    Stewart Vernon Roving Reporter Staff Member Super Moderator DBSTalk Club

    21,626
    392
    Jan 7, 2005
    Kittrell, NC
    I don't know what to suggest to improve it... but I agree that I don't like the last 2 minutes being nothing-ball when a team is ahead, has the ball, and the other team is out of time-outs. This is true in other sports I watch... like basketball... but the difference there is that this doesn't happen until the last 30 seconds or so of the game and even then the other team can commit fouls that result in change of possession after the penalty... whereas in football penalties don't result in change of possession.

    So while I do find those last 2 minutes tedious when the winning team doesn't have to do anything... I can't really argue that it is "unfair" to the other team that had the previous 58 minutes to compete.
     
  6. fluffybear

    fluffybear Hall Of Fame

    7,316
    38
    Jun 19, 2004
    Peachtree...
    if a game is 60 minutes than it should be played for 60 minutes and dropping to the knee for the last 2 minute is not playing!
     
  7. Laxguy

    Laxguy Honi Soit Qui Mal Y Pense.

    15,541
    617
    Dec 2, 2010
    Monterey...
    Of that 60 minutes, though, less than ten minutes is actual action.... (this is not to disagree with your premise).
     
  8. Stewart Vernon

    Stewart Vernon Roving Reporter Staff Member Super Moderator DBSTalk Club

    21,626
    392
    Jan 7, 2005
    Kittrell, NC
    But it is played those last 2 minutes.

    Teams do the same thing in the last 2 minutes of the first half too... decide not to try and score and let the clock run out rather than give the ball back to the other team.

    Teams also don't run plays at the end of a quarter if they would be kicking against the wind so they can wait for the quarter to end and then kick the other direction.

    Like I said... I don't like it as it isn't entertaining... but tempo is a part of the game all game long. Some teams try and run lots of plays, other teams try to use the entire play clock. That's true the entire 60 minutes.
     
  9. JoeTheDragon

    JoeTheDragon Hall Of Fame

    5,175
    102
    Jul 21, 2008
    What about the clock stops if the offensive team has the lead and fails to advance the ball past the line of scrimmage.
     
  10. fluffybear

    fluffybear Hall Of Fame

    7,316
    38
    Jun 19, 2004
    Peachtree...
    I'd go with that!
     

Share This Page

spam firewall