1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Pan Am OAD 09/26/2011 Pilot

Discussion in 'TV Show Talk' started by cj9788, Sep 26, 2011.

  1. cj9788

    cj9788 Hall Of Fame

    1,669
    2
    May 14, 2003
    Loved the music, the clothes, the whole feel of the show, I think this is my new favorite show. Sorry for the wrong date I recorded it on West Coast feed and my guide had 09/26/2011 as OAD. MOD please feel free to change date to 09/25/2011 in thread title.
     
  2. phrelin

    phrelin Hall Of Fame DBSTalk Club

    15,104
    330
    Jan 18, 2007
    Northern...
    Was I ever surprised, favorably, when we watched it tonight. Somehow I missed the memo that this show was going to have a "cold war spy" element.

    For a pilot the writing was good and the story was introduced without overdoing it. The feel of the show was more or less true to the early 1960's. The period songs were fine, but the occasional epic film background music was a bit much. The acting was solid, the primary characters being better designed than the new "Charlie's Angels."

    In the next two weeks, ABC should promo the espionage element to draw audience.
     
  3. olguy

    olguy Hall Of Fame

    1,234
    0
    Jan 9, 2006
    We enjoyed it. I never thought I would think of anytime in my life as the time for a "period piece". :lol: And it brought back a few pleasant memories of tales my late baby sister told. She was a Continental stewardess from 1961 - 1966 when she married the B-57 driver she met in the O club at Clark AFB while ferrying troops in and out of Viet Nam.
     
  4. phrelin

    phrelin Hall Of Fame DBSTalk Club

    15,104
    330
    Jan 18, 2007
    Northern...
    I really was impressed by the premier. The Bay of Pigs thing was really unexpected as an intro to that mysterious ex-stewardess.

    About being a "period piece," I was a skeptic when I read this quote at EW about comparing it to "Mad Men":
    There was a lot of critical comment in advance about the $10 million spent on the pilot. But some of that money was wll spent on thoughtful, complex writing creating what could continue to be complex characters.
     
  5. olguy

    olguy Hall Of Fame

    1,234
    0
    Jan 9, 2006
    The only thing that bothered me at all was the apparent youth of the pilot. Many commercial pilots in the 60's were WWII vets. Sis flew with several of them.

    I am looking forward to the series. Wonder if we will see Bridget later?
     
  6. njblackberry

    njblackberry Icon

    655
    1
    Dec 29, 2007
    I enjoyed the pilot a lot more than I expected to. Great historical references, music and scenery. Looking forward to next week's episode!
     
  7. Maruuk

    Maruuk Hall Of Fame

    1,951
    9
    Dec 4, 2007
    You know, some big critics lumped this in with the Playboy Club which is a huge turkey, but I think they're being unfair to Pan Am. It's not great, but it's definitely got something going on.
     
  8. mreposter

    mreposter Hall Of Fame

    1,711
    1
    Jul 29, 2006
    Yep, this one took me completely by surprise, it was nothing like I was expecting. I wonder if they can keep up the production values - that may be tough for an internationally-set period piece. If they do a "very special" episode where everyone's locked in the luggage compartment for the whole show, you'll know it's because of the budget.

    The one thing that confused me a bit was headliner Christina Ricci's relatively small part in the first episode. Granted, they needed to establish the spy storyline, but I'm wondering if Ricci's character will be more of a supporting one rather than the lead.
     
  9. Nick

    Nick Retired, part-time PITA DBSTalk Club

    21,906
    209
    Apr 23, 2002
    The...
    Based on her past experience playing 'jailbait' roles, perhaps the Ricci credit is being used as bait for the show. If that is the case, then it works for me! :sure:
     
  10. Maruuk

    Maruuk Hall Of Fame

    1,951
    9
    Dec 4, 2007
    Ricci's huge scary sunken eyes make her look like an escapee from the Adams family, and she was clearly the odd man out looks-wise on the show. And role-wise, she had nothing to do once the plane took off.

    But the rest were very well cast, a very attractive and fresh ensemble. Really well done show, which is not surprising since Tommy Schlamme was directing (West Wing/Sports Night).

    Looking forward to next week's show.
     
  11. phrelin

    phrelin Hall Of Fame DBSTalk Club

    15,104
    330
    Jan 18, 2007
    Northern...
    Enjoyed episode 2. It appears that the CIA - MI6 Cold War subplot is significant and will continue. It's nice to find something with possible mystery that isn't about bodies and computerized forensics.
     
  12. Maruuk

    Maruuk Hall Of Fame

    1,951
    9
    Dec 4, 2007
    Wow the Berlin ep was amazing. Some heavy stuff in there. Props to the writers for making it all work. Kind of a "West Wing" vibe with the mix of romance, light comedy and serious drama. A keeper.
     
  13. phrelin

    phrelin Hall Of Fame DBSTalk Club

    15,104
    330
    Jan 18, 2007
    Northern...
    Yeah, this is a well written and produced show. Unfortunately, ABC needed to introduce it in January instead of against Sunday Night Football.
     
  14. RunnerFL

    RunnerFL Well-Known Member

    17,054
    312
    Jan 4, 2006
    I felt quite the opposite. The Berlin episode is the one that convinced me the show isn't worth it and I canceled my series link.
     
  15. phrelin

    phrelin Hall Of Fame DBSTalk Club

    15,104
    330
    Jan 18, 2007
    Northern...
    What about the show made you feel that way?

    Having lived through that time, it seemed very real to me, in a fictional drama way. But I wondered if it was too much focusing all of an episode on three historical elements that represented intense but accurate emotions of the time:
    • An otherwise reasonably intelligent young adult behaving like a groupie about Kennedy.
    • An accurate portrayal of the pain caused to a victim of German occupation when Kennedy chose to offer forgiveness to Germans.
    • A bit of a stretch, but the complexity of a young American stewardess functioning as a volunteer CIA courier (yes, they did this) facing up to the real risks taken by those trapped on the other side of the Cold War.
    I'm curious.

    Also, for those who don't know this, when jets began to replace prop planes in the airline industry there was a generational thing going on in the pilot ranks. WWII pilots flew prop planes. Korean War pilots were the first to fly jets. Airlines frequently put the younger pilots with jet experience in the captain's chair first.
     
  16. pablo

    pablo Icon

    913
    5
    Oct 11, 2007
    I'm loving Pan Am, I hope it's around a few seasons at least.
     
  17. RunnerFL

    RunnerFL Well-Known Member

    17,054
    312
    Jan 4, 2006
    Well the biggest thing for me is that they stage this in Terminal 6 which wasn't built until 1970 and they are in 1963... The CGI of the planes is just plain bad, no pun intended.

    I know that stewardesses were popular back then but they weren't rock stars that could just walk into any party that they wanted.

    They seem to just fly anywhere and are always together when you don't always fly with the same "team" let alone the same pilots. You also have assigned areas and don't just randomly fly anywhere in the world on a given day.

    The story lines are just blah...

    I will give them credit though for pointing out JFK said he was a jelly doughnut which everyone else seems to overlook.
     
  18. Stuart Sweet

    Stuart Sweet The Shadow Knows!

    37,060
    287
    Jun 18, 2006
    I agree with RunnerFL. Really sub-par production design. The CGI looks like Microsoft Flight Simulator, the costumes look inauthentic and the entire thing has the look of a set, not the look of real life in 1963.

    It's very hard, when looking at the production design, not to mention the hair. The men's hair is for the most part completely wrong. And, for all the attention paid to the idea that women were supposed to wear girdles, I don't think they were. The girdles of the day would have given the women a much more constrained posture that I don't see there.

    The plots may improve, and that may rescue this show from its poor attention to set design and detail, much like you really didn't care that The Wonder Years didn't look particularly '60s or Happy Days didn't look particularly 50s.
     
  19. phrelin

    phrelin Hall Of Fame DBSTalk Club

    15,104
    330
    Jan 18, 2007
    Northern...
    Well, they did have to decide on how to split the budget between the cost of production design (sets, CGI, etc.), location expenses, and people (actors, directors, writers, etc.) and while I like Christina Ricci (probably the most expensive actor on the show) as noted in this article she isn't the ideal actress for the look.

    By the way the article does reflect what I know about girdles of the time period, that they were becoming more flexible and less movement restraining:
    It's an interesting article and offers this picture from The Pan Am Historical Foundation:

    [​IMG]

    On the foundations web site they note:
    They haven't offered any post premier critique.

    I hope that now we have the relevant backstory, the episode story arcs will improve though the article causes me some concern that the next few episodes are going to become a 1960's travelogue:
    That's a bit of an overstatement as at the end of 1963 a lot of us watched the hope and optimism reflected in Ricci's character in this last episode ominously carried to a grave.

    We'll see.
     
  20. Stuart Sweet

    Stuart Sweet The Shadow Knows!

    37,060
    287
    Jun 18, 2006
    That's a great picture and really illustrates what's wrong with the overall design of this show (in contrast.) Look at the "whitewalls" on that guy in the center. Look at the posture of every woman in the picture... back straight but leaning slightly forward. The mural on the wall, hopelessly hokey by today's standards but obviously quite exciting then. Also notice that neither man is wearing a hat. I could see wearing a hat in the airport — my granddad did, even though it was gauche to do so inside. He wore hats in the airport and the train station but took them off when he sat. Too much indoor hat wearing in Pan Am.

    Yes, I'm still as picky as ever, and until Mad Men comes back I'll be biting into this show with vigor.
     

Share This Page