Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'General DISH™ Discussion' started by lisacor, Dec 1, 2008.
No need to feel bad. We all have our moments. I know I do for sure.
I've hit the group button and nothing happens. Do I need a bunch of shows with the same title for it to work? Seems folders only work on shows with the same title... or am I missing some trick button sequence? I'd like to put all concert footage in a folder called "Music", is this possible?
This is not possible at the moment. Grouping only groups the same shows.
It is messy, but since it groups by title changing the titles to the same text will group various shows. (I have a folder named "Russert" with all the shows about Tim that were recorded with various names.)
Like John says, you would have to rename everything Music or ....
Take HDNET tonight, Sherly Crow, Goo Goo Dools, and Bon Jovi, Record them change the show titles to Music or heck even "M", their title changes, but you would know what the show really was as the guide info telling you it was concert x would stay with the show. You wouldn't have 3 seperate show in your recordings, just a folder with those 3 shows. I hadn't thought about doing that, is useful. I started using guide as I was tired of paging through pages of Naurto, Bleach, Inuyasha, Desperate Housewifes, Bones and other shows the family watchs while I am gone, and ALWAYS forgets to delete them after watching them. Now I just zoom on by the folders to my shows.
What's getting closer?
"Soon" is getting closer.
So was duke nukem. For 10 years
there is nobody out there more anxious than me for the online scheduling stuff. i check the site every couple days. just long enough to see that pointless 'coming soon' banner.
Doesn't make any sense. This is not a feature that needs a year to get right after a beta release (even Windows takes less time !).
Only explanation is that it got de-prioritized.
I wasn't speaking to the priority DISH is placing on the feature ... only that they had a working version a long time ago that they apparently have decided to redesign before releasing it.
I'd rather they get it right rather than just be "first".
In the grand scheme of things, adding a new feature is almost never as important as keeping existing ones humming along. Adding a new feature not only is new development, but verifying that you don't break any existing stuff in the implementation.
I also 2nd the notion that being first doesn't always = being best. History is filled with examples of the second-to-market being the adopted popular thing, and the first just getting the trend started and not actually making much profit.
I always remember the Apple Newton and its not-ready-for-primetime implementation of a great idea before its time. People go nuts for tablet PCs and iPhones and what not now... but laughed the Apple Newton out of existence. It was ahead of its time AND rushed to market before it was polished.
Wow, how many times has that happened in the five or ten releases? It seems like something always gets trashed with each new release.
Not to nit pick but this comparison is really not a good one. The newton platform was never meant to be a PDA solution. In fact, the term PDA hadn't even been created in 1989 when the newton project was based on the notion of completely reinventing the PC experience. it also used an object oriented graphics kernal.
But the reason it didn't work was two fold (compared to today's)
1. it was not intended to subsidize computing it was meant to replace it. Bad idea, complete failure
2. The things that made the ipod and tablet pcs the huge hit they are now is because of the internet and the connectivity it brings.
I suppose you could say it was before it's time. but only because the connectivity options today were not even possible then, and the size difference in today's laptops in phenomenal.
It also matters that the O/S is windows now, and that the Mac O/S was not exactly top of the heap in the late 80s and early 90s
They were also afraid of it affecting Macintosh sales.
No the reason the project failed was due more to project slippage and scope creep.
Anyway, sorry to go off topic.