1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Sinclair may pull locals from Dish on 8/16

Discussion in 'General DISH™ Discussion' started by RAD, Aug 13, 2012.

  1. Aug 14, 2012 #21 of 147
    maartena

    maartena Hall Of Fame

    2,828
    9
    Nov 1, 2010
    DirecTV had the same problem with Tribune back in may. A good 30+ markets had channels pulled plus the national WGN channel. I think it took 4 days of black before they got a deal.

    I'm siding with Dish on this one though, just like I sided with DirecTV. It has been noticed that in recent years, programmers have been asking for extreme price increases or unrealistic "all or nothing" carriage deals, such was the case with the recent Viacom/DirecTV dispute.

    I say drop em for a week. They won't be able to last for much longer than that, and Dish will have a good deal. I guarantee you, people aren't fleeing anywhere the first week. Not even the second week.... so Dish (and DirecTV) will lose a LOT, LOT less than these stations will in advertising income that they now can't show to millions of Dish viewers in a variety of regions.

    So even though I am not a Dish subscriber, I stand with Dish. Suck it, Sinclair!
     
  2. Aug 14, 2012 #22 of 147
    Stewart Vernon

    Stewart Vernon Roving Reporter Staff Member Super Moderator DBSTalk Club

    21,626
    391
    Jan 7, 2005
    Kittrell, NC
    Hey! I resemble that remark... ;)

    But seriously...

    I'm in a weird boat on that.. being in that DMA. I actually don't care if they drop the SD feeds (all they currently have) because when I watch either of these I watch them OTA for HD.

    BUT... if the new agreement would include carriage of the HD feeds... then I care.

    I mostly care about CW in HD... but if MyNetwork was in HD I would watch sometimes because they have some local and college sports at times.

    So... the current threat to drop doesn't bother me since I don't watch those SD channels... but I would like the HD feeds.

    To that end... I actually took some time earlier and visited the Sinclair Web site and told them just that... that I didn't care much for the negotiating over price part of the conversation... but that I cared more about if they would get carriage of their HD feeds on Dish. I told them I wanted to watch the HD feeds on Dish, but didn't care otherwise.

    Not that it will make a difference... but I can hope!
     
  3. Aug 14, 2012 #23 of 147
    James Long

    James Long Ready for Uplink! Staff Member Super Moderator DBSTalk Club

    46,189
    1,074
    Apr 17, 2003
    Michiana
    That is the good news for viewers when it comes to these mega owners. The importance of affiliates in bigger markets to the providers means that "package deals" that lead to carriage or better carriage of co-owned stations in other markets can be written. The down side is the markets that lose a major network while the owner plays chicken with a provider in order to get more money or better carriage. Most conflicts end in some carriage arrangement.

    Here are two examples of arrangements that worked out better for the viewers in my market:

    The first is WSBT, a CBS affiliate which at the time they were negotiating carriage had the UPN network on a sub-channel. DISH agreed to carry the sub-channel in order to get the major network ... and although UPN is long gone and the WB station became The CW, carriage of that sub-channel continues years later.

    The second example is Weigle Broadcasting. In my market they own three low power stations ... which cannot exert a right to carriage. But they also own major network stations in other markets ... so since DISH wants the big stations elsewhere they ended up carrying all three of the low power stations (one of them being our ABC affiliate).

    I am looking forward to the next contract fight with Weigel. I expect that will lead to CW in HD and carriage of the low power sub-channels for THIS, MeTV and Telemundo.

    I do NOT support local stations holding out for money ... but I do support local stations and satellite carriers partnering together to get all the feeds carried via satellite. (I would not mind seeing the PBS channel carried in HD along with their channel's SD subfeed, but as a non-commercial channel they don't have the negotiating pull of the commercial channels.)
     
  4. Aug 14, 2012 #24 of 147
    BillJ

    BillJ Icon

    863
    6
    May 5, 2005
    This could get very ugly. I remember the battle a few years ago between a rural community cable system and Sinclair over retransmission of the Peoria, IL station. Again Sinclair wanted an outrageous increase. The cable system eventually countered by asking its customers to contact the station's advertisers and warn them they would no longer patronized them. It dragged on for months before Sinclair backed down enough for them to reach an agreement.
     
  5. Aug 14, 2012 #25 of 147
    dakeeney

    dakeeney Legend

    177
    0
    Aug 29, 2004
    Sinclair owns MyTv, which is worthless and they own the ABC station in Asheville, NC. I do watch certain shows on ABC. I'm not in favor of the Fed's stepping in but something needs to be done about these providers wanting outrageous fees. IT WILL take an act of Congress to change things.
     
  6. Aug 14, 2012 #26 of 147
    dakeeney

    dakeeney Legend

    177
    0
    Aug 29, 2004
    If we do lose local channels could Dish carry the networks from other areas to make up for the loss?
     
  7. Aug 14, 2012 #27 of 147
    tsduke

    tsduke Godfather

    506
    2
    Mar 20, 2007
    No, that's the part the providers like dish want the FCC to change. If these stations are going to charge for retrans I think they need to loosen up the law. Those laws were bases on free over the air model.
     
  8. Aug 14, 2012 #28 of 147
    ATARI

    ATARI Hall Of Fame

    1,876
    0
    May 10, 2007
    As long as it gets settled by 9/9 (first Packer's game on FOX47).

    If not, I go buy an antenna.
     
  9. Aug 14, 2012 #29 of 147
    dakeeney

    dakeeney Legend

    177
    0
    Aug 29, 2004
    I think it's time the FCC stepped in and give permission for Dish to go ahead and be able to do this with federal mediation being allowed.
     
  10. Aug 14, 2012 #30 of 147
    dakeeney

    dakeeney Legend

    177
    0
    Aug 29, 2004
    free OTA modules for the Hoppers!!
     
  11. Aug 14, 2012 #31 of 147
    Marlin Guy

    Marlin Guy Hall Of Fame

    2,129
    7
    Apr 8, 2009
    Ditto for me. Two stations I NEVER watch.
     
  12. Aug 14, 2012 #32 of 147
    dakeeney

    dakeeney Legend

    177
    0
    Aug 29, 2004
    How about Dish carrying the Distant Network Stations?
     
  13. Aug 14, 2012 #33 of 147
    SayWhat?

    SayWhat? Know Nothing

    6,262
    133
    Jun 6, 2009
    Retransmission fees need to be banned.
     
  14. Aug 14, 2012 #34 of 147
    RasputinAXP

    RasputinAXP Kwisatz Haderach of Cordcuttery

    3,145
    12
    Jan 23, 2008
    And it's time for me to steer clear of the Dish Facebook page again. This is going to get ugly.
     
  15. Aug 14, 2012 #35 of 147
    dpeters11

    dpeters11 Hall Of Fame

    16,345
    503
    May 30, 2007
    Cincinnati
    Good thing that the deal for Sinclair to buy 6 stations from Newport won't close until December. That would have added 5 more major networks, including CBS in Cincinnati. Hopefully a deal will be made well before then.
     
  16. Aug 14, 2012 #36 of 147
    StringFellow

    StringFellow AllStar

    101
    0
    Jan 5, 2012
    And what about us rural folk?? :)
     
  17. Aug 14, 2012 #37 of 147
    Santi360HD

    Santi360HD Icon

    921
    0
    Oct 6, 2008
    New York City
    as a subscriber to D* I am in full support of the clique that has E* and their channel negotiations..

    But one has to ask...If DISH is REALLY looking out for us?? you guys with E* I mean.. (which every provider says during an outage or alleged pull) how come contracts cannot be negotiated if all subscribers do is pay their bills?

    I can understand the hand in my hat mentality if there were delinquent people across the board not paying their monthly tabs at DISH and had to pull said channels because people aren't ponying up their bills...but its getting a bit tired now in that any provider cannot negotiate because 1 strong arms the other...they make plenty of money from the subscribers...WHERE IS IT ALL GOING???? that we have to have more ridiculous threats of channel pulls??
     
  18. Aug 14, 2012 #38 of 147
    Athlon646464

    Athlon646464 Gold Members DBSTalk Gold Club

    3,045
    66
    Feb 23, 2007
    Uxbridge, MA
    Cable is not immune to this. It's happening to CATV subs around the country as you are reading this reply.......

    It's the new reality given the economy we are in coupled with all of the new technology the content providers are dealing with.

    Here in Boston, the ABC affiliate (Channel 5) was down for weeks on Time Warner Cable.
     
  19. Aug 14, 2012 #39 of 147
    DoyleS

    DoyleS Icon

    1,028
    8
    Oct 21, 2002
    El Dorado...
    Nothing in California plus OTA reception is great here.
     
  20. Aug 14, 2012 #40 of 147
    Paul Secic

    Paul Secic Hall Of Fame

    6,226
    23
    Dec 16, 2003

Share This Page