1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Temporary DNS Expansion Continues

Discussion in 'DIRECTV Programming' started by RobertE, Jun 24, 2010.

  1. Jun 24, 2010 #1 of 110
    RobertE

    RobertE New Member

    8,024
    0
    Jun 9, 2006
    DIRECTV will soon be launching local channels in additional markets. In the interim until locals are available, DIRECTV will be providing Distant Networks where:

    1. there is no local station or
    2. where there is a local station available, but based on waivers granted by the local broadcasters, Distant Networks can be provided temporarily.

    DirecTV will be providing Distant Networks to the following markets starting on June 30

    • Abilene-Sweetwater TX- Available out-of-market signals: CBS-NY, NBC-NY and PBS
    • Amarillo TX- Available out-of-market signals: FOX-NY, NBC-NY and PBS
    • Billings MT- Available out-of-market signals: ABC-NY, FOX-NY and PBS
    • Erie PA- Available out-of-market signals: ABC-NY, FOX-NY and PBS
    • Hattiesburg-Laurel MS- Available out-of-market signals: ABC-NY, FOX-NY, CWe and PBS
    • Lubbock TX- Available out-of-market signals: ABC-NY, CBS-NY and PBS
    • Monroe LA-El Dorado AR- Available out-of-market signals: FOX-NY, NBC-NY and PBS
    • Wichita Falls TX-Lawton OK- Available out-of-market signals: FOX-NY, NBC-NY and PBS

    Important Notes:

    • DNS will be delivered on the Ka band, and customers will need to have MPEG-4 equipment to receive them.
    • Distant Network Services will either be from Los Angeles (West) or New York (East). The provider for PBS is out of Alexandria, VA. The provider for the CW Network is out of San Diego (West) or Washington, D.C. (East).
    • Additional markets will also launch DNS in the next few weeks. :)

    This list is subject to last minute changes and additions.
     
  2. Jun 24, 2010 #2 of 110
    hdtvfan0001

    hdtvfan0001 Well-Known Member

    32,456
    258
    Jul 28, 2004
    Happy for all those folks....an interim step...but still some new HD viewing.

    Wonder what the % national LIL coverage will be when these are in place.
     
  3. Jun 24, 2010 #3 of 110
    Rob

    Rob Icon

    613
    9
    Apr 22, 2002
    I wonder what the precentage of those that get the DNS get upset when they are taken away for their local networks? Especially if they receive them already OTA.
     
  4. Jun 25, 2010 #4 of 110
    JosephB

    JosephB Icon

    1,399
    46
    Nov 14, 2005
    Birmingham, AL
    Well since it's been said up front that this is not forever, so they shouldn't be upset.
     
  5. Jun 25, 2010 #5 of 110
    ronsanjim

    ronsanjim Godfather

    417
    0
    Mar 18, 2008
    Cherokee...
    What surprises me is that D* is foregoing the revenue those DNS were generating from customers without the networks. I was paying $14 a month for the NY/LA stations, and during the Fall TV season, $20. for the networks, CW and PBS. Now I'm paying zilch.:)
     
  6. Jun 25, 2010 #6 of 110
    Indiana627

    Indiana627 Hall Of Fame

    3,272
    5
    Nov 18, 2005
    My HD locals (Binghamton, NY) are scheduled to be launched this fall (we currently don't even have SD LIL). We do have all four of the major networks available here OTA (that's how I get them), but does this mean that we will be getting HD DNS up until the time D* launches our HD LIL this fall? Or will there be no changes for us here?
     
  7. Jun 25, 2010 #7 of 110
    hdtvfan0001

    hdtvfan0001 Well-Known Member

    32,456
    258
    Jul 28, 2004
    I believe that only the listed markets in the first post are affected at this time. The good news is that any obstacles to you getting yours as planned have pretty much evaporated.
     
  8. Jun 25, 2010 #8 of 110
    xceebeex

    xceebeex Legend

    173
    0
    Jun 17, 2010
    Yea, I was hoping that Binghamton would be added to the list since the antenna that I currently use is a little hit or miss with the OTA stuff. I am not currently an active DirecTV user, but scheduled install is next week and the lack of locals has me on the fence because I don't want to have to deal with a fussy antenna but I may do it anyway.

    The other thing that I am thinking of doing is getting an AM21, but I would hate to buy that unit and then have them add these temporary DNS options for our area.
     
  9. Jun 25, 2010 #9 of 110
    hdtvfan0001

    hdtvfan0001 Well-Known Member

    32,456
    258
    Jul 28, 2004
    Perhaps they'll repeat this approach a bit further down, closer to the Binghamton launch.
     
  10. Jun 25, 2010 #10 of 110
    xceebeex

    xceebeex Legend

    173
    0
    Jun 17, 2010
    I wish they could tell me if that would be the case because I really don't want to buy the AM21 and then have no use for it (which technically will be the case anyway after the official launch of locals which is October).
     
  11. Jun 25, 2010 #11 of 110
    trainman

    trainman Hall Of Fame

    1,640
    38
    Jan 9, 2008
    Sherman...
    A little surprised they're not getting the L.A. stations, since Billings is on Mountain time.

    Of course, given the choice, I'd rather get my shows an hour early than two hours late.

    With the AM21, you can receive digital subchannels that won't be carried as part of your locals by DirecTV, so it won't be completely useless even after October.
     
  12. Jun 25, 2010 #12 of 110
    erosroadie

    erosroadie Godfather

    389
    0
    Jan 9, 2007
    I have an AM21 with UHF antenna and live 40 miles west of Chicago. I receive the sub-channels from the OTA networks, which often leads to HD broadcasts where the D* locals are in SD. Further, when a strong storm is coming from the Southwest, I am able to pick-up Chicago locals, which are due East.

    Not a hassle to install the antenna and the AM21 works well with my HR21. No downside to OTA even though I receive D* HD locals (for some channels). A worthwhile investment...
    :wave:
     
  13. Jun 25, 2010 #13 of 110
    joshjr

    joshjr Hall Of Fame

    4,821
    86
    Aug 2, 2008
    NE Oklahoma
    Here is what you need to do. Call and ask for a HR20 to be put on your work order as the requested reciever. Then when and if you dont get one then they activate you and you call and say I requested for the HR DVR that had the tuners in it but did not get it and request for a free AM21. They will more then likely send it free pretty easy. If you really want to increase those chances then when you call the day activated then call and at the prmopt ask for retention. Shouldnt be an issue getting a free AM21.
     
  14. Jun 25, 2010 #14 of 110
    RobertE

    RobertE New Member

    8,024
    0
    Jun 9, 2006
    This is just my speculation on what the rest of the year will look like. I believe that DirecTv will end up offering DNS in all markets that are missing 1 or more of the big 4 (or 5/6 if you coun't CW & PBS), until such a time that agreements and capacity are in place. The nice thing will be, I believe this will also put some pressure on the true locals to not be crazy with their retrans fees.

    More markets are planned, just don't have any info on them yet.
     
  15. Jun 25, 2010 #15 of 110
    ciurca

    ciurca Godfather

    428
    0
    Apr 14, 2009
    Robert....what happens in "short markets" like mine Salisbury MD. We have cbs, abc, pbs and fox (fox OTA is sd, due to being a sub channel of the cbs stream) When locals are available, do I still keep my NY DNS nbc, and what about Fox. Do I keep the NY DNS Fox since the local station broadcasts in SD?
     
  16. Jun 25, 2010 #16 of 110
    Michael H..

    Michael H.. Member

    196
    5
    May 31, 2007
    Has DTV actually stopped charging you, or told you that they would?
    And if they did, would it be only during the interim period, until LI is available, that DNS is offered?

    I'm interested because I'm stuck with the same $14 + $2.50 + $2.50 (well, $19 rather than $20) for the DNS add-on. I assumed that those of us that ordered DNS (from Pegasus days... SFO/SEA/PIT/CHAR mixed in with the LA/NY, and later), as opposed to those that are going to be getting it as an interim no-LIL fix, would still be charged for it, but to be honest, I haven't contacted DTV to ask. I'm not saying you're wrong... for obvious reasons, I hope you're right, but I am curious if you've gotten something in writing from DTV which confirms this. Also, unlike you, there are no plans for LIL in my area, maybe ever, so I don't think interim DNS is going to be offered, so I may still have to pay for it, for that reason.
     
  17. Jun 25, 2010 #17 of 110
    jdspencer

    jdspencer Hall Of Fame

    6,646
    14
    Nov 7, 2003
    When our locals become available, my DirecTV bill will actually go down. :)
    I currently have DNS for the four networks. I get both coasts SD and HD from NY for $14/month. The locals will cost $3/month, so I'll be saving $11/month. :D I could remove DNS now, but OTA can be a bit quirky for me.

    I'll probably keep the AM21 active so that I can receive The CW and My Network (both SD) and possibly PBS and it's subchannels.
     
  18. Jun 25, 2010 #18 of 110
    Michael H..

    Michael H.. Member

    196
    5
    May 31, 2007
    ... forgot to also say...
    I'm assuming that you didn't/aren't cancelling DNS, knowing that you would then get it for free. That really isn't an option for me, because I don't think they're offering it as a no-LIL interim substitution... and even if they WERE, though I would qualify to reconnect DNS after, I would lose grandpappying in the event LIL ever did come to fruition, and its worth $19 to me to avoid that.
     
  19. Jun 25, 2010 #19 of 110
    RobertE

    RobertE New Member

    8,024
    0
    Jun 9, 2006
    I honestly have no idea. Don't know enough of the STELLA law and it's translation into regular speak to even form a guess. :)

    Personally, I think D* & E*, should be able to light up DNS services for everyone in unserved markets until locals become available. At that time, the customer will get their locals, and if they wish to keep the DNS feeds, pay a nomial fee for them (part of which would go to the repsective locals for the "lost" viewership).

    In a way I can see the desire for DNS feeds, but when it comes down to it, I like having my locals for the local news and other local events. However, there are times that I would like another feed to catch a show that was prempted by the locals or washed out due to weather. Win-Win for everyone. That's my personal take.
     
  20. Jun 25, 2010 #20 of 110
    jdspencer

    jdspencer Hall Of Fame

    6,646
    14
    Nov 7, 2003
    Any chance that DNS for The CW and My Network would go HD?
     

Share This Page