1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

The official Pac-12 discussion thread

Discussion in 'Sports Programming and Events' started by Stuart Sweet, Sep 17, 2012.

  1. Sep 20, 2012 #81 of 831
    donm

    donm Legend

    168
    0
    Aug 19, 2003
    Same opinion as your statement that the Pac 12 is trying to charge more to Directv then other providers and is and making an unreasonable offer.
     
  2. Sep 20, 2012 #82 of 831
    Hoosier205

    Hoosier205 Active Member

    6,659
    14
    Sep 3, 2007
    Now we've exposed the issue. Many of us do care, because it matters. DirecTV needs to make a wise business decision, not add the channel in any way possible. Poor business decisions on their part impact us as customers. If I wanted a provider that makes bad decisions that I will have to pay for later...I'd be with Dish.
     
  3. Sep 20, 2012 #83 of 831
    Hoosier205

    Hoosier205 Active Member

    6,659
    14
    Sep 3, 2007
    ...no it isn't. Not even close. We KNOW they are not offering identical deals. Do you have anything to back up your claims or not? I provided quotes earlier.
     
  4. Sep 20, 2012 #84 of 831
    donm

    donm Legend

    168
    0
    Aug 19, 2003
    I can agree with that! I just don't think it is as bad a deal as you must think it is from Directv's side. I want them to get the best deal possible without leaving their customers without the Pac 12 Network. I just think the way it is appearing right now it will not get done. Trying to get the Pac 12 Network in a RSN or their own package just won't happen IMO.
     
  5. Sep 20, 2012 #85 of 831
    donm

    donm Legend

    168
    0
    Aug 19, 2003
    Nobody knows for sure but the Pac 12 came out and said they are offering very similar deals. The exact same deal as Dish signed without the exclusive signage which Directv could of probably had if they wanted earlier. I'm sure the Pac 12 Network could give up something similar to Directv if that was the only holdup. Directv doesn't say anything about being offered a higher cost deal then any of the other providers. I'm sure Directv would come out and say we want a deal similar to the other providers but they haven't yet. Also why do you think they would be charging more to Directv (from you opinion) when they are so important for the Pac 12. It would be very dumb to be trying to charge more for something that has been already negotiated for over a year and with 40+ other providers already signed.
     
  6. Sep 20, 2012 #86 of 831
    Hoosier205

    Hoosier205 Active Member

    6,659
    14
    Sep 3, 2007
    I agree. The PAC-12 Network execs missed their best window of opportunity. Men's basketball will be next, but there wasn't a single PAC-12 school in the last poll from the previous season. Only three conference teams were ranked in the top 25 in last year's preseason and they all dropped off the map pretty quickly. So, that doesn't bode well.

    Again, when has DirecTV indicated that they want that?
     
  7. Sep 20, 2012 #87 of 831
    Hoosier205

    Hoosier205 Active Member

    6,659
    14
    Sep 3, 2007
    No, they said the deals were the same. Then they said they were, "fundamentally similar." Sounds trustworthy...
     
  8. Sep 20, 2012 #88 of 831
    donm

    donm Legend

    168
    0
    Aug 19, 2003
    I have to agree with the Pac 12 not being a very good basketball conference for the last few years. I think after the football season is over it makes it very hard to get a deal until next football season. I'm not sure it was the Pac 12 execs messing up. Sometimes it is better to not make a deal then a bad deal and that is on both Directv and Pac 12 Networks side.
     
  9. Sep 20, 2012 #89 of 831
    donm

    donm Legend

    168
    0
    Aug 19, 2003
    Sounds trustworthy to me. You are just looking to see how the Pac 12 is lying or trying to charge more to Directv when there is no proof that is the case.
     
  10. Sep 20, 2012 #90 of 831
    Hoosier205

    Hoosier205 Active Member

    6,659
    14
    Sep 3, 2007
    Forget the end of the football season, I think this weekend is key for the network to get the most they can. After that, I think any deal reached will be more pleasing to DirecTV than it would have been.
     
  11. Sep 20, 2012 #91 of 831
    Hoosier205

    Hoosier205 Active Member

    6,659
    14
    Sep 3, 2007
    The proof that they were lying is in their own statements. It's right there for anyone to read. Add that to the tacky situation of those taxpayer funded public employees who spoke out on the situation...
     
  12. Sep 20, 2012 #92 of 831
    donm

    donm Legend

    168
    0
    Aug 19, 2003
    Yup, I think you are right. That's why I don't think there will be a deal at all or at best just before next football season. I hope I'm wrong but I can't see how it can get done but I never thought that Dish would sign a Pac 12 Network contract either. I would be one happy guy if something happen and Directv and Pac 12 had a agreement this weekend. You never know and I have seen things happen but I'm just not to optimistic.
     
  13. Sep 20, 2012 #93 of 831
    donm

    donm Legend

    168
    0
    Aug 19, 2003
    I'm not sure what your talking about.
     
  14. Sep 20, 2012 #94 of 831
    DC_SnDvl

    DC_SnDvl Godfather

    276
    0
    Aug 17, 2006
    You don't have any proof that either side was lying. We know one is, we will never know who that is.

    I am calling tonight to get the cost of Big 10 dropped from my bill based on the latest DTV statement that only people who want it should have to pay for it. They just opened a can of worms with that.
     
  15. Sep 20, 2012 #95 of 831
    sdk009

    sdk009 Icon

    695
    19
    Jan 19, 2007
    Kihei, Maui, HI
    Basketball will be on an upswing, as UCLA's 2012 recruiting class was ranked 2nd by Rivals.com and Arizona's was ranked 3rd.
    Add to it the vast amount of basketball programming the channel will carry compared to football, I think it will be even more imperative for the league to make a deal once November rolls around.
     
  16. Sep 20, 2012 #96 of 831
    Hoosier205

    Hoosier205 Active Member

    6,659
    14
    Sep 3, 2007
    Sure we do. We have the commissioner's own statements.
     
  17. Sep 20, 2012 #97 of 831
    donm

    donm Legend

    168
    0
    Aug 19, 2003
    I think you are probably right about the future of Pac 12 basketball. I think Utah or Col I forgot which also had a good recruiting class. I do hope the Pac 12 gets back to being a top basketball conference. At one time I thought the Pac 10 was the second best or no worse then third best conference but that was years ago.
     
  18. Sep 20, 2012 #98 of 831
    kick4fun

    kick4fun Godfather

    487
    6
    Aug 9, 2006
    Are you assuming "the DEAL" has been the same from day one? NO CHANGE?? to go from saying the deal was the same to almost the same to me implies that things may have changed, especially with the advertising in the stadiums..
     
  19. Sep 20, 2012 #99 of 831
    kick4fun

    kick4fun Godfather

    487
    6
    Aug 9, 2006
    PAC12..... The "Conference of Champions," the Pac-12 has won more NCAA National Team Championships than any other conference in history; the three schools with the most NCAA team championships belong to the Pac-12 (UCLA, Stanford and USC, in that order). With Arizona State's softball title in 2011, the conference won its 400th NCAA Championship.
     
  20. sigma1914

    sigma1914 Well-Known Member DBSTalk Club

    14,602
    372
    Sep 5, 2006
    Allen, TX

    Although impressive, that's not a very fair statistic due to the Pac schools having more sports. Sports like Water Polo aren't played east of the Rockies. Tennis, golf, swimming and diving are also predominately west with collegiate sports. Softball was also a historically west coast sport.

    What's odd is after the top 3 Pac schools, little Abilene Christian is 4th with Oklahoma State 5th.
     

Share This Page