No you did not, you only say my reasoning is flawed, but you did not point out where. All you can say is I am good at imagining, that yes I am guilty of. Through my countless imaginations, I have been correct in the following so far: 1) The hardware claims would not be brought back by TiVo again. 2) Violation on the face is not enough, colorable difference must be looked at. 3) Not telling the judge about the design around is not enough of a violation, the design around must be looked at. 4) Colorable difference must first be looked at, the judge later modified his order to reflect just that. 5) There is enough on the E* side to argue their case, the judge confirmed this now. 6) There is nothing new from TiVo, in fact TiVo is saying less than before 9/4/08.