DISH/SATS did not provide volumes and volumes of evidence to prove that adjudged receivers have new software. DISH/SATS can only state they placed the modification in the stream, but that people could opt-out of accepting the download. Make separate distinctions, here. Neither of which has been referenced by DISH/SATS in their filings, to date, and neither of which appears to have been an enjoined product. The process was enjoined, so the infringers changed the process, which was easily allowable. Neither case appears to have ordered products disabled, just the infringing process. If that were allowable in this case, none of us would even be arguing.