1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Tough choice coming up

Discussion in 'DIRECTV General Discussion' started by JeffBowser, Apr 8, 2013.

  1. litex2x

    litex2x Legend

    Sep 8, 2012
    Agreed. The culture is changing and people want to watch shows on their own schedule. The majority of all my friends seem to only ever watch TV shows on Netflix and rarely watch the premieres of new episodes. If you're strapped for cash the internet is really the only thing you need at home to provide entertainment so its no surprise most people are looking for value.
  2. mdavej

    mdavej Hall Of Fame

    Jan 30, 2007
    Very true. I would not wish a cable DVR on anyone. They are shockingly antiquated. And WMC users are a very small group. But I just wanted to illustrate that it is possible to have a good DVR if you bring your own (even Tivo), and save a ton of money to boot. I thought I would never resort to WMC myself, but turns out it was much easier to set up and use than I ever dreamed. So I highly recommend it to anyone on cable. If WMC weren't an option, I'd still have DirecTV. In my current situation, I'm saving at least $40/month versus satellite or cable DVRs.
  3. acostapimps

    acostapimps Hall Of Famer

    Nov 5, 2011
    I still have cable tv per se through my Internet even though there's only digital unscrambled QAM channels that the TV scans, when hooking another cable up from a 2-way splitter to the tv. But I heard there getting rid of those unscrambled channels also, At this point in time it doesn't seem to be a bad idea changing providers every 2 years just to get customer discounts if there's no other way get discounts or credits if you aren't eligible.
  4. acostapimps

    acostapimps Hall Of Famer

    Nov 5, 2011
    It never hurts to ask for credits when you tell them that you are paying too much or you're struggling making payments, whenever you call about your situation they are willing to help you out if you feel you are paying too much, And if that doesn't work you can always say you are canceling to another provider to see what approach they'll make.
  5. ehilbert1

    ehilbert1 Godfather

    Jan 22, 2007

    I think this is one of the best posts I have ever seen here!!:D You are right on with that post too.

    The truth is it's nobody's business why people switch every two years. It doesn't mean that a person is cheap either. People do what is best for them and their family. Who are we call people cheap?? If you don't like it tough. I have no idea how people can be "fanboys" of a TV provider. There is way more to life than TV.
  6. Tom Robertson

    Tom Robertson Lifetime Achiever DBSTalk Club

    Nov 15, 2005
    Because I want my DBSTalk pages to load extremely fast so I can post even more... :)
  7. n3vino

    n3vino Godfather

    Oct 2, 2011
    I agree with you . It doesn't mean people are cheap if they want to save some money. How about this one. A fool and his money are soon parted. Why pay X for A, when you can get A and B for the same price?
  8. akw4572

    akw4572 Legend

    Sep 7, 2005
    I'll tell you exactly why. Five months ago, I was way out of contract with DTV, and I called to see if I could get a WHDVR, and some money knocked off. My bill had risen to about $100 a month, and I had two HR 22's that were painful to use. They said no, they couldn't do anything for me. I went to cable. They gave me a "deal", I already had phone and internet with them, and they were given me cable for $70 a month that included everything I wanted, and a WHDVR. 2 months later, they raised my phone and internet, about $25, and told me my guaranteed price was only on my cable. Then I called to cancel my home phone. There was a new tower built by my house, and I could now get great cell phone coverage. They were going to RAISE my bill another $30 if I cancelled home phone, because I'd be losing my bundle (even though they had told me my cable was on a separate contract). I answered one of the DTV's emails, and now I'm getting WHDVR, cinema connection, MLB EI, and Sunday Ticket for free, and the ultimate package for like $64 a month, and like $80 a month for the second year. So I've lowered my bill a considerable amount, gotten new equipment, and gotten more channels. I really had no intention of coming back, but their deal was too sweet to pass up. My install is tomorrow.
  9. inf0z

    inf0z Legend

    Oct 15, 2011
    Comcast Internet speed vs price sucks. I'm not sure about ATT but my local Telco offers 40 down and 20 up for $65 a month, which Comcast charges about $80 for 25 down and 5 up. If I could get my apartment manager to get phone line installed that isn't 40 years old I would switch from Comcast with out a second question. I would contact ATT first just to see what they may have in your area since you last inquired.
  10. TBoneit

    TBoneit Hall Of Fame

    Jul 27, 2006
    MY time is worth money, That is why I have high Speed Internet.

    On the other part of it. I do have well over 5,000 posts on another forum, However I'm a Moderator there so that is to be expected.

    I value my time enough to not want to wait for something on slow Internet.
    I'll be downloading the MS Patch Tuesday security fixes in a few moments. With the Fast Internet I won't even see an impact from that.

    Different User name too. I use this one for satellite forums only.

  11. bobcamp1

    bobcamp1 Icon

    Nov 8, 2007
    D* sometimes offers their own bundle with local phone/Internet providers. Some of them aren't advertised. You get them by calling retention when you go to cancel. I was offered the advertised bundle, said I still wanted to cancel, followed by a better bundle I almost took but it still cost $20 more per month.
  12. JeffBowser

    JeffBowser blah blah blah

    Dec 21, 2006
    Around here, ATT is the only bundle. In my neighborhood, DSL is the only thing ATT offers. Non-starter.

  13. RACJ2

    RACJ2 Hall Of Fame

    Aug 2, 2008
    I did the opposite, switched from Time Warner Cable to DIRECTV and saved over $800 my first 2 years. I got by with cable, because my father-in-law had DIRECTV with NFLST. So we would go to his house to watch the games on Sunday. When he passed, I made the switch to DIRECTV. Now with NFLST and NHLCI having all the games I watch in HD, it would be hard for me to switch. Although if TW Cable suddenly had NFLST and NHLCI with all HD and I could save $800 again, I would switch.

    When I switched DIRECTV, I dropped TW Cable TV and Internet. For internet I went to AT&T, since they had the best speed available at the time. And it was the same 6MBbs you had, which was actually 5Mbps consistently. Then Time Warner upgraded their equipment and I switched back.

    You're right about sharing the pipe, the speed can vary. Although I now prefer to share the pipe using TW Cable. I only have 20Mbs service, but I get higher speeds then I had. Even at peak usage times, I get more than 10Mbs, which is double what I was getting with AT&T. It cost more @ $40/mo, then AT&T was @ $20/mo, but its worth it. Especially since I work from home when not traveling and my employer pays up to $50 for internet service. So its actually free for me.
  14. jmpfaff

    jmpfaff AllStar

    Dec 12, 2004
    Depends where you live and what your choices are. I'm certainly not a Comcast fan (hence I'm browsing a DirecTV forum)....but I've got to give them credit on the Internet service in my area.

    I used to stick with Telco DSL to avoid the supposed shared pipe problem. I was paying $63/month for 10 down, 768k up. Never got quite the advertised speeds, usually in the 8's on download speeds. Called the Telco and told them I needed a faster upload speed (company VPN was struggling when working from home and making VOIP calls), they said it wasn't available.

    So I am currently paying Comcast $30/month for 25 down, 5 up. That will go to $65/month after 12 months. (Those prices are Internet only. I could add basic cable for $5/month if I desired.)

    And regarding the consistency of the shared pipe.....I've never gotten less than 20 down on speedtest in the 6 months I've been on Comcast. Not a single time. Up speeds vary a bit, but never less than 3.5 Mbps. And I frequently get speedtest results that exceed my supposed 25/5 limits -- they've been as high as 32/8 during primetime, and I just got 28/6 as I was typing this.
  15. goinsleeper

    goinsleeper Godfather

    May 22, 2012

    I'm not their biggest fan either, especially after finding out 90-95% of the cost of their higher end internet packages are pure revenue. I currently get the 25 down / 5 up package but in my area they're increasing our speeds as some kind of competitve trial or something, and currently I'm speed testing at 65 megs down and 11-12 up. I would have to say it's rather nice. I've never tested lower than 33 megs down, even before they increased the speeds. I'm running a DOCSIS 3 Motorola SURFboard with an ASUS RT-N56U wireless router. Computer is wirelessly connected to the router which is about 20 feet away with no walls blocking. I've got a Logitech Revue in my bedroom which is quite a bit further away with walls between and it has flawless connection.

    I posted incorrectly in another thread about Google Fiber in Kansas City. Last I checked, their gigabit connections were $60/mo. Sad days when everyone else is looking at $70+ for 25 megs...
  16. JeffBowser

    JeffBowser blah blah blah

    Dec 21, 2006
    Spent some time with Comcast vs DirecTV at lunch. Picture-wise, HD is pretty similar. However, Comcast's channel guide looks about 20 years old, with weird number choices and no way to sort between what you are subscribed to and not, and no indicator in guide to let you know if you get the channel or not. Plus, if I want, for example, WPTV channel 5 in HD, I have to remember that 5 is SD, and some bizarre number in the 400's is the HD version.

    Their guide, in short, is awful, compared to DirecTV. Not sure it's $140 some dollars awful, though. I'll give it a few months with both yet.
  17. billsharpe

    billsharpe Hall Of Fame

    Jan 25, 2007
    Besides my $720 savings over two years, I also got a larger-capacity, responsive multiroom DVR, lots more VOD, a much better SD picture, and local public-service channels with my switch to FiOS. The slow DVR response to my remote inputs is what started me on the search for another provider.
  18. dpeters11

    dpeters11 Hall Of Fame

    May 30, 2007
    I never understood why cable did it this way. It also is the bane of a lot of us (fortunately not me), where we can't get our parents etc to switch to the HD channel, even though they have HD service etc.

    A friend of mine has lamented that DirecTV does not do it this way, he preferred them being split. I'd hate it.
  19. longrider

    longrider Well-Known Member DBSTalk Club

    Apr 21, 2007
    Elizabeth, CO
    There actually is a valid reason why cable doesn't do that which is only slowly fading away. When part of a cable system is analog "channel 4" has a very specific meaning. Until you are 100% digital you cant have two "channel 4"s. Of couse they could have done like DirecTV did with On Demand and just added 1000 to the SD channel number - 4 SD is 1004 HD, 210 SD id 1210 HD, etc On a funny side note to this, when a system does try to go 100% digital there is usally a ton of complaints because every TV now needs a cable box
  20. bidger

    bidger Hall Of Fame

    Nov 19, 2005
    If you're not going to use a third-party approach, TiVo or Cable Card for HTPC with extender, you're probably not going to adjust to Comcast's equipment.

Share This Page