Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'DIRECTV General Discussion' started by JeffBowser, Dec 8, 2012.
When the HR22 was New, it Never worked like new.:hurah:
Now that is Funny (but sadly True)!!! :lol:
It takes 48 hours from the time you called to receive a replacement unless you call on a weekend. That's far less time than taking it to a place to be repaired where they may get to it within a week. The time it takes to box up the old unit and send it back isn't counted towards how long you're without TV, but the time it sits in the repair shop is. Oh, and if you take it to be repaired it's still "an old Refurb unit". Repairing IS refurbishing.
If you're worried about your recordings and willing to go a week or so without TV (if it is your only unit) then no problem. Most people aren't like that though. And, again, if you have it repaired it becomes "refurbished".
Not to me or, I'm sure, most of DirecTV's customers.
There's a lot of complaining about getting refurb receivers. Is there a service provider that will guarantee a NEW replacement or do they also provide used equipment?
I ask because it seems as if this practice surprises everyone; as if it’s somehow different from everyone else. Honestly, I don’t know if it’s changed but every cable service I’ve ever had did it this way. I remember getting some pretty dinged up replacement boxes so if another service provider is replacing a bad box with a new one as standard practice I’d like to hear about it.
It does seem to be the standard procedure. It wouldn't kill them, however, to have an option (or even a "hidden" option, where someone has to know about it ahead of time and specifically ask) to receive a new box, and/or specific model of box, for an extra fee.
Very few new receivers fail when they are first turned on. They fail after they have been used. Cost dictates a used receiver that failed be replaced with a refurbished receiver. If DirecTV or any other service provider were to fulfill peoples wishes of getting new receivers as replacements the cost would be astronomical and passed on to the customers.
THey are replacing HR24's etc with STB's they (D*) don't want back themselves. I was sent an HR21 called and asked to have it sent back. 2nd one arrived and same STB HR21 arrives. I have called 3x to get a returning shipment label but none have arrived. I read where others were told to keep their HR21. So I have 1 HR20, 1 H21, and an HR21. All in the man closet collecting dust.
Just use the code word Shibboleet....sorry, obscure xkcd reference
Well, you could ask the Smithsonian if they want them. :sure:
I've been pushing for this approach for years as it would give an Option to those not happy with the current system to pay a little more to get what they want.
Directv would make more money and the Directv Customer would be happier also, so it is a Win-Win Situation.
Exactly. And if it was not officially promoted, but only whispered by word of mouth in circles like Dbstalk, the whole thing would be self-screening because the reps wouldn't have to suggest a course of action that would annoy most of their customers. The only people that would ask for it are those already willing to pay extra.
Having worked for both manufacturers and distributors of warranty parts I can say that my experience is that warranties, both original and extended, are backed with the promise of "new or like new" equipment. That means a lot of reconditioned parts and products are sent out and as long as they work "like new" the terms of the warranty have been satisfied. A unit that fails is replaced with one that works and does the same thing as the failed unit. It is almost never new, especially under extened warranties or protection plans.
DirecTV is by no means the only one to do this. It's actually an industry standard. You had a DVR, you get a DVR. If and when it dies too, you get another DVR.
You are assured of having a working DVR. No more. No less.
It functions as well as the current software release allows. There is a decided difference.
I've never had service with anyone where I'm using their equipment and I receive new items as replacements.
"new or like new" equipment with equal or better features/performance. Recording capacity is a feature.
Imagine buying a brand new 2013 vehicle with a no-lemon warranty and finding out your replacement is a used 2010 model. According to DTV this is ok. :nono2:
DTV policy is plain scum. Replacements should be of equal or better features/performance. If I have an HR24 that dies I shouldn't have to accept anything less than an HR24 replacement. If they don't have any refurbished ones then too bad - replacement will be new. That's the fair and honest policy people expect.
Well, if you have an HR24 you will be sent a Replacement HR24 so that is an Exception as I am sure it also applies to the HR34.
That is why I buy Owned HR24s and I have the Protection Plan so that Guarantees me a Replacement HR24 and nothing else is acceptable.
Richie is right - its one of the differences between the mainstream leased devices that most people have and the limited number of users with owned equipment.
In the case of leased - you get what replacement they send you.
In the case of owned - you get the same or newer device (assuming you have the Protection Plan).
At this time, most people have leased HD DVRs.
Seriously? Unless something has changed this is the exact same policy as every other service provider.
I could understand the vitriol if this is somehow unique to DIRECTV and so far afield from the rest of the industry as to violate our trust as subscribers. It is a fact that this is a common industry practice and has had for decades. Call me flag waving fanboy blindly sticking up for DIRECTV but you can’t dispute my comments.
In everyone's rush (at least thru page 2) to defend DirecTV, they seemed to have missed the most logical response to the problem. If all the equipment is functionally equivalent, they shouldn't have to worry about upsetting new customers, right. Everything should be good. Both new and established customers would be happy.
They may be functionally equivalent but certainly not speed equivalent. It's a fact but not a consideration in replacement...with the possible exception of the HR24.