What is the difference between "reality" and "documentary"?

I will attempt to answer using my sketchy memory of a class I took on documentary filmmaking in 1987.

"Reality" programming, which is better termed "unscripted" television, is an entertainment product that makes no attempt to inform or educate, or enrich the world at large. It makes no promise that real events were not altered or staged.

"Documentary" programming, in its purest form, is an attempt, through the documentation (with as little staging or intrusion as possible) of naturally occurring events, to inform or educate, and generally implies a call to action. Even a documentary showing happy people in a happy place would imply that unhappy people in unhappy places have something to learn.

"Survivor" is an unscripted program because its producers actively set the scenes and record what happens.

"Planet Earth" is a documentary. While you can argue that there has to be some staging, and certainly some editing, in order to tell a story that people will watch, everything on the screen simply happened and the camera operator was there.

"Survivor" makes you want to get another beer. "Planet Earth" makes you want to recycle the can.

In the middle are "infotainment" (or more kindly, "magazine") shows like Mythbusters, 48 Hours, Dateline, etc. where investigative journalism is actively used to uncover something that is (hopefully) true.

 

Stuart that has got to the be best one-line description of the difference between "reality" and "documentary" I have ever read!!

 

Well said, could not have done a better job if I tried.

 

Dr. Jeremy Murray-Brown, if he were to read this site, would be pleased to think I actually remembered something

http://www.bu.edu/jeremymb/about.htm