Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'DISH™ High Definition Discussion' started by Kali05, Oct 1, 2005.
Seems like all the concern about when MPEG4 debuts is putting the cart before the horse. First we need to see MPEG4 receivers and DVRs. Have any retailers had a look at them yet? I've read comments about the 962 but is that fact or rumor?
Well, without knowing what comments you've heard, there's no way to confirm or deny them.
But if you're asking if there actually is such a thing as a 962, then the answer is yes.
The only version I can NOT confirm is the 422, which will be a necessary box to replace the 322 without great pain.
If E* is smart, the back panels on these boxes will match the older boxes so that it'll just be a plug-for-plug swap. Otherwise, they're going to have to hire CSRs that can actually spell "Dish".
You know... it just occurred to me... every time I see a new "when will MPEG4" thread, it reminds me of the kid in the backseat of the car on a road trip...
"Are we there yet?"
"Are we there yet?"
Careful - you'll get slammed for "negative posting".
If I'm not mistaken, MPEG4 is "simply" a different compression algorithm that on one side compresses files smaller than MPEG2, but on the flip side requires more computing power to decompress in real time.
I wouldn't be surprised if E* already put more powerful processors in its recent high-end units so they could upgrade those units with software only. That's what I would have done and those engineers at E* are smarter that me.
Computations on that level are normally done in dedicated chipsets. Solid state still works better than software, even after 40 plus years of development.
I wasn't insulting anyone... Just noticing a coincidence between the kid in the car who wants updates every 5 seconds when nothing has changed and the folks who want to know about MPEG4 when there isn't anything new to know.
Just an interesting psychological observation
Are we there yet? :lol:
No, it's not all speculation. It's history. We have a very high likelihood, way beyond speculation, that...
1. New equipment will be required.
2. It won't be available for lease to existing subscribers (see the 942), but they can outright purchase it.
3. No upgrade path is available. (See #2.)
For you to caveat otherwise is just plain disingenuous. If you can't learn from history, you can't learn from anything.
When you are dead wrong will you still be here to correct? It's obvious that new equipment will be needed since not one current receiver can handle MPEG4 - but it is only paranoia that suggests that E* won't do something special to get those new receivers into customers hands.
Past performance is not indicative of future results.
I know MPEG 4 will save bandwidth over MPEG 2 ... but not if they are supporting both formats at once.
My guess is they will cut the bandwidth on MPEG 2 broadcasts as they add MPEG 4 to give customers a little extra incentive to upgrade to an MPEG 4 receiver and complete the conversion earlier.
Am I missing something here?
Dish currently provides HD channels on dedicated transponders (TPs), i.e., only HD channels are on a TP with other HD channels. This is because although Dish uses MPEG-2 for both HD and SD, they use QPSK encoding for SD and 8PSK for HD. I have to believe that when MPEG-4 is introduced, it will be segregated on separate TPs similar to what is done with HD and 8PSK currently.
Don't drown yourself in kool aid! Dish did nothing to get the 942 in our hands. Only new subscribers (to Dish, not just to HDTV) got deals. Given the multi-year roll-out of MPEG-4 (per Dish themselves), I doubt Dish will see any need to cut us deals.
Learning from history is not paranoia. But there is a word for trying the same thing repeatedly and expecting a different result eventually.
Why do you believe this? Do you have a recent (last four months) source?
Your original post was hopeful, but you didn't provide any reason to believe it. When I pointed out contrary evidence (hardware, history), rather than rebut it you cast me wrong and paranoid - perhaps not the most thought-provoking of responses. History, Charlie's consistency and some communications I have had with Dish all fail to support your perspective. Do you have any evidence, or just a generalized optimistic world view?
Do you? Nope. You are speculating --- Why do you believe that speculating negative is OK and you want to shut me down? How about making your fifth post on this forum a statement from Dish backing you up?
Sorry for the harsh reply but we cannot assume negative or positive on this issue - the point of my prior post. If you have evidence, present it. Otherwise just accept the fact that you are making assumptions. OK
You are mischaracterizing my messages. I haven't made any attempt to "shut you down", nor did I claim anyone was paranoid. All I'm trying to do is point out that history and consistency are likely more accurate barometers of the future than, as you put it, speculation and assumptions.
I have pointed out evidence... the past. I also have recent communications with Dish where they refused to even agree with Charlie's statements from January. That's very fast back-pedalling on their part. These are more than just tea leaves in an empty mug. I asked what evidence you have because you seem to place blind speculation at the same faith-level as such evidence; I'm trying to understand why.
It doesn't really matter - my source indicates the MPEG-4 roll-out isn't as near as previously thought. But I am intrigued by your approach that would seem to require absolute proof, with a blood signature, to tip trade-ins into the longshot category. Not all speculation is created equal. (Not that you have to agree with my handicapping - if we all agreed, such conversations would be quite boring. )
You chose to assume the former -
I was hoping for some proof that your speculation wasn't.
We're already past the expected date, so on that part you cannot be wrong!
Besides, you quoted a paragraph on receiver swap policy - not on release dates. Which argument did you want?
I understood my communications in the last week to indicate that January is perhaps at risk, and that when it does happen, it will be a slow process. That latter bit surprised me; my guess would have matched that of several members here that they would try to expedite it, to free up the bandwidth.
However, I am interpreting words that were intentionally circumspect. They do seem to make perfect sense in the context of history though.
What I don't have any insight into is why January is at risk and they should move slow. It seems to me that the DBS advantage is trumped by cable's HDTV (and internet broadband, soon telephony) selection for the high-end user. I would have expected them to be very aggressive about onboarding HD content and getting it to us, whether by new codecs or by leasing extra bird space. Perhaps it's a technical hurdle, perhaps a financial one, but either way there's some big part of the picture that I'm just not grasping.
On swap policy vs release dates, I expect them to delay release further, but I don't care . I expect them to not provide a trade-in, based on history and communications, and I care a bit. But the latter (trade-in) is what I thought we were debating speculation about. Apologies if I mangled quotations.
Your analogy is invalid, and I've seen it many times before. Just because the 921 was a bad receiver doesn't mean you are entitled to a free upgrade. Did Ford give Pinto owners free Escorts?
The MPEG-4 switchout is unlike any previous situation. It is in their interest to move it along. It's bad for them to just flip it instantly, but it's also bad to let it drag on for more than 2 or 3 years. And EVENTUALLY, they will have to give anyone that still has an MPEG-2 receiver a new one. Does that mean everyone gets a new, top of the line machine. Obviously not. I've heard some talk that the 411 will become the new base receiver. Notice one of the features is that it "outputs HD and SD simultaniously."
There will be activity at both ends of the spectrum. HD-LIL markets will get new machines quicker and cheaper, so the SD-LILs can be shut off quicker. But new national HD content will push other people to pay full price.
Creating an incentive to upgrade means less out-of-pocket cost for DISH later. Why give someone something for free in a few years when you can get $100 now? And DirecTV is banking on the HMC because customers with expensive, high quality equipment are less likely to churn. By the same token, DISH should be trying to get the 962 to as many people as possible.
Perhaps Dish has made it hard for loyal customers to get a 942 because they know they have to upgrade them later. (A real conspiracy theorist might even think the current software bugs are a way to scare people off until the 962 is ready.)
I think the second part of your statement is basically right. The day MPEG-4 gets turned on will not be the day to find a deal. But they will come eventually.
The only thing we really know... is that we don't really know anything
But past history and some business logic suggests a few popular rumors:
1. Dish may begin adding new channels, HD for instance, that are only available in MPEG4. They would then offer paid/discounted upgrade paths to the "early adopters" who are often willing to pay to get the latest hardware.
This serves the purpose of "forcing" some of us to upgrade, but not alienating most customers... provides a revenue stream for Dish to get some additional moolah to fund their upgrade efforts... and provides a larger testing bed of folks who might uncover early problems.
2. When #1 has been live for a while (months, perhaps a year), Dish will start converting existing channels to MPEG4. Either multicasting (sending both MPEG4 and MPEG2 to not cutoff old customers) OR converting a particular niche, like HD for instance, all to MPEG4 and again providing a upgrade path at some cost, but this time the cost will be a bit better as they want to entice more of us to upgrade.
3. Depending on how #1 and #2 progress... Dish will have to make a decision before they can convert everything over to MPEG4 and stop all MPEG2 use. Either they have a small customer base on the old equipment and they are ok with risk of alienating them by forcing a paid upgrade... OR they have a substantial customer base that has so far refused to pay upgrade... and they have to work a free upgrade to a lowest-end MPEG4 receiver for everyone OR make it very inexpensive.
Stage #3 would most likely take 1-2 years at least depending on how many folks need to be swapped out I would think. Consider how long the over-the-air transition from analog to digital broadcasting has been going on!
All of the above is pure speculation, but there's some logic to it.