1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Windows 8 - Any first hand experiences?

Discussion in 'Tech Talk - Gadgets, Gizmos and Technology' started by wilbur_the_goose, Oct 26, 2012.

  1. Dec 4, 2012 #121 of 130

    Cholly Old Guys Rule! DBSTalk Club

    Mar 22, 2004
    Re: the Start Button. I use this: www.windows8startbutton.com
    It gives me the classic Windows 7 start screen with all its goodies and shut down.
    I still have the capability to revert to the Windows 8 interface if I so desire.
    So far, I've found Windows 8 to be stable. I've also discovered at least one program that works with Windows 8 that did not work with Windows 7 -- Nikon's Picture Project photo editing software.
    I have one hardware related problem: my Seagate 1 TB Backup Plus drive fails to be recognized more often than not - the drive apparently tries to initialize before my WD USB3 adapter has been started. This is a common problem with Backup Plus drives (regardless of OS) that Seagate fails to acknowledge (just check their forums). They have yet to release a USB3 adapter for the drives.
    One other quirk: upon startup, I get a good connection with my Netgear dual band wireless network adapter, but it quickly goes away and the system then goes through the process of hunting for a connection again and establishes it. This is on the 5 GHz radio -- I haven't tried on 2 GHz.
  2. Dec 4, 2012 #122 of 130
    Stuart Sweet

    Stuart Sweet The Shadow Knows!

    Jun 18, 2006
    Why is it bad for business? Because businesses aren't going to up and reinvest in touchscreens overnight. Many business PCs are 3+ years old and that's a problem. Using Win8 "the way they want you to" requires a touchscreen or extremely large touchpad.

    If I "had" to use Win8 for work I would install Start8 or any of the other Start Screen replacements and simply use it as I used a Windows 7 device. That's not exactly a ringing endorsement of Microsoft's new OS.

    I have spent a lot of time with 8 at home, and I've learned a lot of keyboard shortcuts that help. Not that keyboard shortcuts are really the best way to go... isn't that why people got mice? But nonetheless I figured out how to show a clock when I want one, I installed Chrome so I don't have to use the bizarrely nonfunctional Internet Explorer version in the "Windows Store environment" (or whatever they call it) and by and large I ignore the start screen because the live tiles are a huge distraction when I'm trying to get things done.

    Pretty sad when the best feature of a flagship OS is that you can pretty much make it look and act like the old one.
  3. Dec 4, 2012 #123 of 130

    Shades228 DaBears

    Mar 18, 2008
    Maybe I'm just a fan but I could see how Metro would make a great office environment. The ability to just have all of the programs you need on the front page of metro.

    Live tiles can be disabled just by right clicking on them and turning off the live updates.

    I do agree that the metro IE is a waste of time and they should have just used the regular version if it's installed. If they had forced everyone to use metro to start without a destop option then it would have even more complaints. However I think that once people start to customize it they will start to see the benefits of it.

    The largest reason's that companies won't adopt it immediately is the same reason they didn't adopt Vista, or 7. It has to do more with their support level rather than what's out there now. Then there's the whole custom software aspects. Microsoft could give companies free licenses for a year to swap early and most large companies would not do it because of security and program compatibility reasons.
  4. Dec 4, 2012 #124 of 130

    houskamp Active Member

    Sep 14, 2006
    from what I've seen of it it's just another product in microsoft's "we want to go out of buisness" plan..
    ie9 is a joke, 10 even worse.. why make a web browser that can't view the web that's out there?
    now they build win8 and make it for a 3yr old kid..that kind of main screen is for things that don't have enough power to run multiple things.. that's why we use them on phones and tablets.. you have to dump/switch/reload stuff.. on a PC you leave them running and just switch view..

    my OS is for running programs, I don't really care what it looks like.. there are some new things in 7 that I like but really the win98se look worked fine too.. I could get to programs, switch quickly, and copy/paste between them..
  5. Dec 5, 2012 #125 of 130

    harsh Beware the Attack Basset

    Jun 14, 2003
    Salem, OR
    I'm taken back to GEOS on the Commodore 64.

    I'm not convinced that being able to see a relatively large tile is ultimately a more effective representation of what's going on than the tabs in the Taskbar.

    Extra (or longer) steps in navigation abound; a hallmark of later versions of Windows (especially the Control Panel).
  6. Dec 5, 2012 #126 of 130
    Stuart Sweet

    Stuart Sweet The Shadow Knows!

    Jun 18, 2006
    Shades228, keep fighting the good fight. As of yet you're the only person I know who actually likes Windows 8 for what it is. I'll disable all the live tile functionality, that's a good idea. Might even try to find a clock app.

    Overall I am reminded to Apple's switch to the G3 processors about 14 years ago. It was a good computer, if you bought a floppy drive, a keyboard with all the function keys, a functioning mouse, a zip drive (hey, it was 1998) and the adapter you need to use a VGA monitor. Then you had a functioning computer.

    In a predictable move, Apple appeased professional users in the next generation, bringing back a usable mouse and keyboard, allowing for internal zip drives, industry standard monitor ports and hey, they even decided not to make the computer bright blue. Microsoft, are you listening and learning?

    This is like that. Start with Windows8, put the start button back on the desktop, turn off the live tiles, buy a huge touchpad, possibly a second monitor, and hey you might have all the functionality you had last week provided you are willing to learn the new gestures and keyboard shortcuts.

    Change is good. Change that makes people more productive and more engaged is good. Change that removes productivity and makes people wonder why they bothered is not.
  7. Dec 9, 2012 #127 of 130
    Marlin Guy

    Marlin Guy Hall Of Fame

    Apr 8, 2009
    I've been setting a new laptop this weekend with Windows 8. It's a mistake to put it on a non-touch device.

    That being said, the absolute best thing to know about Windows 8 is "Windows Key + X".
  8. pfp

    pfp Whatever

    Apr 28, 2009
    My $.02 something like Start8 is required and makes it perfectly workable.
  9. heathramos

    heathramos Legend

    Dec 19, 2005
    one thing I read about Windows 8 that sounded interesting is that the built in mail client supports ActiveSync.

    I was thinking users could use that instead of Outlook offsite and wouldn't need Outlook Anywhere anymore.

    Of course the Mail client makes you sign on to a Microsoft account so that sucks.

    I guess I would need Outlook 2013 for that feature.
  10. Stuart Sweet

    Stuart Sweet The Shadow Knows!

    Jun 18, 2006
    I've been trying to use Mail with an Exchange account but it's kind of a drag. Even the web client for Outlook is better. In fact using Mail with multiple accounts is an exercise in hair pulling. You'll get an audio cue that you have a message but have no idea what account it's on, so you have to keep pushing buttons until you find it.

Share This Page