XStreamHD Press Conference

Discussion in 'XStreamHD (Closed Forum)' started by Chris Blount, Jan 8, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Earl Bonovich

    Earl Bonovich Lifetime Achiever

    30,092
    3
    Nov 15, 2005
    I thought they were striking because they want a bigger cut of the INTERNET versions of the programs...

    The xStreamHD model, is a LOT closer to the DVD Rental/PPV business
     
  2. flipper2006

    flipper2006 Godfather

    300
    0
    Oct 2, 2006
    Cant go the way of Voom, you would need to find a father and son that fight with each other and dont give a damn about the customer :eek2:
     
  3. Sirshagg

    Sirshagg Hall Of Fame

    4,922
    0
    Dec 29, 2006
    I think it's about new delivery methods, both known (such as Internet) and unknown, which are not covered by the current contracts.
     
  4. SteveInNC

    SteveInNC AllStar

    65
    0
    Oct 8, 2007
    I would be amazed if you got to "keep" movies. The studios have given every indication that they would like a business model where you effectively PPV for each view. From their perspective, Divx (the DVD-like format) was a good thing...:nono2:

    What may make the studios bend their preferences somewhat in favor of this provider/mechanism is that this gives them a chance to poke Apple in the eye. I strongly suspect that Macworld is going to yield an amp'ed-up AppleTV combined with some form of downloadable rental model. The described XStream unit and delivery method end-run that pretty effectively.
     
  5. Tom Robertson

    Tom Robertson Lifetime Achiever DBSTalk Club

    21,331
    247
    Nov 15, 2005
    The ownership/rent/PPV model will all depend upon the studios in conjunction with XStreamHD. I can see many options being possible, such as a time-based viewing right, number of viewings based price, and full ownership of the library item option. Done right, all models could work for any movie. Transformers I might buy outright; others only rent for a few showings. And first run might be a one day PPV until it's released for owning.

    Cheers,
    Tom
     
  6. SteveInNC

    SteveInNC AllStar

    65
    0
    Oct 8, 2007
    Also, the XStream system sounds like a steroid version of Disney's failed MovieBeam VOD system. MovieBeam distributed movies down to a DVR-like box via digital signals on PBS OTA broadcast channels. Movies accumulated on your particular box, based on availability. You could then choose to view (and pay for) any of the movies that were presently loaded on your box. Overtime, older movies would be replaced with newer movies. The PPV fee varied based on the expected popularity/age/etc. of the movie and the format (SD/HD) it was in.
     
  7. Tom Robertson

    Tom Robertson Lifetime Achiever DBSTalk Club

    21,331
    247
    Nov 15, 2005
    SteveInNC, do you recall why that failed in the marketplace? That would be an interesting case for XstreamHD to learn from.

    Thanks,
    Tom
     
  8. SteveInNC

    SteveInNC AllStar

    65
    0
    Oct 8, 2007
    I don't know any specifics. I do know that they might have had trouble getting PBS affiliates for sufficient nationwide coverage. I was very interested in the product at the time, but they didn't offer it in my area (Raleigh, NC - UNC Public TV). In some quick Googling around, it appears that they may also have had PQ issues. Disney sold it off in 2006 to another company affiliated with Intel and Cisco , which then shut the service down in December 2007. Here is an EnGadget link to several articles across the history of MovieBeam: link.
     
  9. spoonman

    spoonman Icon

    869
    0
    Feb 21, 2007
    I don't by that many movies DVD or HDM. I don't re-watch that many movies, but I do rent a lot of the from Netflix and getting tried of the increasing waiting game with Netflix.
     
  10. spoonman

    spoonman Icon

    869
    0
    Feb 21, 2007
    If the rumors hold true, and hope not, I will be somewhat disappointed with the Apple rental model. I heard you will only get to keep them 24 hours and they will be $3.99. I think that is too short of a time and way too much for a downloaded movie.
     
  11. dodge boy

    dodge boy R.I.P. Chris Henry

    4,231
    0
    Mar 31, 2006
    I think Voom was out too soon, they had a service before they had enough content.... Just MHO
     
  12. SteveInNC

    SteveInNC AllStar

    65
    0
    Oct 8, 2007
    Yeah, I agree. The studios keep picking weird pricing numbers for variants of PPV, as they do for hard media (DVD, etc.). They don't seem to understand the psychology involved: I'll buy more in total $$ than I would have if I feel that I'm getting value for that money. In other contexts, I refer to this as my "threshold of pain". If your price is enough to make me think about it in relation to the object offered, I'm considerably less likely to buy it. For PPV, my threshold feels like it would be around $2, inclusive (taxes, etc.). I'd be inclined to watch a bunch of PPV during a month at that price, even without ownership. I might watch one PPV each month at $4 per, and that's only if the AppleTV becomes multipurpose like a media center. I've bought exactly one PPV from DirecTV in the fourteen years since I got the service, but I was willing to pay $900 for the original DTV RCA receiver and do a self-install three months before they officially rolled out the then-untried service (early adopter) because the value proposition was that much better to me in relation to the ultra-crappy cable service I had.

    This is similar to my DVD purchase habits. I'll rummage through the DVD discount box at Walmart and will pick up anything remotely interesting for their $5.00 price. At $10, that becomes a thinking decision. At $15, I have to want it. At typical initial retail DVD prices ($20-25), it had better be on my (short) list of favorite movies for me to even consider it - I know that within a few months, the price will drop to or closer to $10, and I'm very willing to wait. This same psychology has kept me from seriously considering either hidef DVD format because the studios decided that they're offering something of more value (I disagree), so they've set the standard price closer to $30-45. I can think of maybe four movies that I would buy at that price, just for the hidef.

    Re: Apple. I would consider $4 OK if you got to permanently retain the movie, even DRMed to your box. The studios' cost of goods is effectively nil for this - Apple is likely the digital media source via iTunes or equivalent - so the studios are just gouging on their margins at that price. They have no distribution costs, effectively no inventory costs, no shipping, no returns, no damaged goods, minimal marketing for the service (sunk cost for the theater release of the movie), plus they can make their entire catalogs available. This means that any archived movie that they have that can cover the digitizing costs would be worth releasing. I don't know where that $$ break-over is, but I suspect that it's virtually free for anything that they've already converted to DVD. They can monetize that many more movies, increasing their total revenue, as opposed to retail where they have to compete for limited shelf space and older titles get cycled out of availability as a result.
     
  13. Earl Bonovich

    Earl Bonovich Lifetime Achiever

    30,092
    3
    Nov 15, 2005
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

spam firewall