So I noticed a discrepancy between the two signal strength checks the HR20 provides -- the page that shows numbers for all available transponders at once in the text-based chart and the graphical "Signal Meters" that just show a transponder at a time. On most of my sats, the two pages line up: the text based page will show an 86 for 101 Transponder 1, the signal meter will read 86%. On 103(a) this is not the case.
I get low numbers from the text based page as follows:
1-8: 79 74 0 0 76 79 N/A N/A
But when I go into the signal meters, I get the following readings:
Transponder 1: 91%
Transponder 2: 92%
Transponder 3: N/A
Transponder 4: N/A
Transponder 5: 91%
Transponder 6: 95%
I've seen the numbers on the text-based page dip into the mid-to-low 60s, but the numbers on the graphical signal meters are generally 89% or above. Is this normal? Anyone else seen this?
I get low numbers from the text based page as follows:
1-8: 79 74 0 0 76 79 N/A N/A
But when I go into the signal meters, I get the following readings:
Transponder 1: 91%
Transponder 2: 92%
Transponder 3: N/A
Transponder 4: N/A
Transponder 5: 91%
Transponder 6: 95%
I've seen the numbers on the text-based page dip into the mid-to-low 60s, but the numbers on the graphical signal meters are generally 89% or above. Is this normal? Anyone else seen this?