DBSTalk Forum banner

1080p 24fps HD VOD ever?

7328 Views 100 Replies 21 Participants Last post by  Artwood
With recent news that DISH may do something like this, what are the chances that D* will have such an offering any time in the future? I love Blu-Ray but would also like to be able to get 24fps material from the sky as well.
1 - 20 of 101 Posts
"ever" is a very long time. Someday, we'll probably see full blown 3-D virtual reality with much greater than 1080p resolution. Hopefully in my lifetime :)
litzdog911 said:
"ever" is a very long time. Someday, we'll probably see full blown 3-D virtual reality with much greater than 1080p resolution. Hopefully in my lifetime :)
I ask because as I contemplate venturing into the BR disc world with a purchase, I would rather have a one-box solution, e.g. D* feeding me 24fps HD movies on demand.
How fast is your download speed :rolleyes:
feschiver said:
How fast is your download speed :rolleyes:
Anything short of ultra fast you won't be streaming 1080p I can't even stream 480i.:lol:
All I can get out here is 1.5mb down,256kb up. I do think directv if they have enough space on their sats should offer 1080p ppv movies.
feschiver said:
How fast is your download speed :rolleyes:
6mb/sec

I watch about 2 movies per week and would not expect to watch them instantly, just would like to have access to them from D*. I thought I read somewhere that the bandwidth requirements to send 1080p 24 frames/sec is not that much greater than 1080i 60fields/sec.
It could come to pass... when and if the demand is there. It is one thing to offer it, another entirely for it to be useful.

Face it, not a lot of people have internet connections faster than 3MB, let alone the 6 or more it would take to make this viable.
LarryFlowers said:
It could come to pass... when and if the demand is there. It is one thing to offer it, another entirely for it to be useful.

Face it, not a lot of people have internet connections faster than 3MB, let alone the 6 or more it would take to make this viable.
I agree. The only way it would be viable is if they delivered it via satellite.
More and more panels are capable of displaying 1080p24fps in some proper multiple, eliminating some judder.

http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=997138

Not everyone has fast download speeds now but its a good bet that such DL speeds will likely increase.
jediphish said:
With recent news that DISH may do something like this, what are the chances that D* will have such an offering any time in the future? I love Blu-Ray but would also like to be able to get 24fps material from the sky as well.
For about the tenth time..... you can already get 1080p/24 video from existing DirecTV HD transmissions. 24fps source material that is transmitted in 1080i/60 has every bit of information that would be contained in a 1080p/24 transmission of the same source. A properly deinterlaced 1080i/60 transmission of 24fps source will be no different than if it had been transmitted in 1080p/24.

If you have a 120Hz refresh rate HDTV the 1080i/60 signal will be deinterlaced into 24 progressive frames per second that are then each repeated 5 times each to match the TV's 120fps frame rate, giving you exactly the same picture that you would have gotten from 1080p/24.

The same idea applies if you are watching on a 60Hz refresh rate HDTV. As long as the TV does the deinterlacing properly, there is no difference in the end result between a 1080p24 and a 1080i/60 transmission of 24fps source material.
Brandon428 said:
Anything short of ultra fast you won't be streaming 1080p I can't even stream 480i.:lol:
1080p/24 takes less bandwidth than 1080i/60. Theoretically, a "fast" internet connection (6-8mb+) should be able to stream that. But what I've found with DirecTV is, their servers can't push it out that fast.
cartrivision said:
If you have a 120Hz refresh rate HDTV the 1080i/60 signal will be deinterlaced into 24 progressive frames per second that are then each repeated 5 times each to match the TV's 120fps frame rate, giving you exactly the same picture that you would have gotten from 1080p/24.
1080i/60 content would have already gone through a 3/2 pulldown to get to 60hz, then simply multiplied times two to get to 120hz. It could have reverse pullodwn applied to it, then processed through proper 5/5, but Faroudja has a patent on that. I don't know if any TVs are doing that. I would expect that most only do a proper 5/5 if they are fed a 24hz input. Therefore, you end up with judder.
DarinC said:
1080p/24 takes less bandwidth than 1080i/60. Theoretically, a "fast" internet connection (6-8mb+) should be able to stream that. But what I've found with DirecTV is, their servers can't push it out that fast.
It appears that downloads are throttled to about 2mbps, my observation of course. I have two HR's networked and with both downloading, at the same time, I still have about 2mbps of bandwidth left on my 6.0 DSL. If I run a speed test while downloading it appears to measure what is not being used at the time. If I am downloading to one HR, my reserve is almost always 4mbps. I'm sure these are not absolute measurements, but good reference anyway.
cartrivision said:
For about the tenth time..... you can already get 1080p/24 video from existing DirecTV HD transmissions. 24fps source material that is transmitted in 1080i/60 has every bit of information that would be contained in a 1080p/24 transmission of the same source. A properly deinterlaced 1080i/60 transmission of 24fps source will be no different than if it had been transmitted in 1080p/24.

If you have a 120Hz refresh rate HDTV the 1080i/60 signal will be deinterlaced into 24 progressive frames per second that are then each repeated 5 times each to match the TV's 120fps frame rate, giving you exactly the same picture that you would have gotten from 1080p/24.

The same idea applies if you are watching on a 60Hz refresh rate HDTV. As long as the TV does the deinterlacing properly, there is no difference in the end result between a 1080p24 and a 1080i/60 transmission of 24fps source material.
For about the second time, your statement is only true in regards to a single frame. 1080i60 frames in succession are more "data" than 1080p24 but its not the native format used in the original movie. 3:2 conversion introduces artifacts that are not there in a 1080p24 transmission.

Cheers,
Tom

BTW, why are you whining about counting? ;)
LarryFlowers said:
Face it, not a lot of people have internet connections faster than 3MB, let alone the 6 or more it would take to make this viable.
Not to mention a TV that would handle that resolution. At least not yet. :)
Speaking of TVs, I was talking to Joe Kane of WideScreen Review (and other cool video toys) at CES in 2007. The CEA who runs the show wanted to have a dedicated internal channel on the show floor that was all 1080p content to help manufacturers showcase 1080p.

It had to be abandoned because only a third of the 1080p marketed TVs at that time really could handle all the 1080p modes, most often failing the 1080p24 mode--most important for movies. :)

Cheers,
Tom
How about getting a decent selection of plain old 720p/1080i HD first? :hurah:
I've got DIRECTV. I've got LOTS of 1080i HD to watch :)
Tom Robertson said:
Speaking of TVs ... only a third of the 1080p marketed TVs at that time really could handle all the 1080p modes, most often failing the 1080p24 mode--most important for movies. :)
Yes, I'm soon to be in the market for a new one. Seems that many, even when fed a proper 24fps signal, still do 3/2 pulldown, then just multiply the result by 2!?! Just seems crazy. And it can be really difficult getting a reliable answer from the Mfg to know for sure how a particular set handles it. :nono2:
Tom Robertson said:
Speaking of TVs, I was talking to Joe Kane of WideScreen Review (and other cool video toys) at CES in 2007. The CEA who runs the show wanted to have a dedicated internal channel on the show floor that was all 1080p content to help manufacturers showcase 1080p.

It had to be abandoned because only a third of the 1080p marketed TVs at that time really could handle all the 1080p modes, most often failing the 1080p24 mode--most important for movies. :)

Cheers,
Tom
My 3 year old TV can handle 24 fps input and will display at 3x the rate (albeit it downscales to 768p but it does display 24 fps native frames in their proper sequence). I realize not all TVs can do this but it would seem that more will as time goes on.
1 - 20 of 101 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top