When my installer came out yesterday there is a newly built house next door, he tried to convince me to go ahead and let him install, because he had set up the dish, and said he was getting a signal. I looked at his signal meter, and it looked to me like it was at about 1/2 strength. I did not let the install go ahead. This was on a bright, clear day, and the house next door is just framed, the brick on the bottom floor, no siding on the top floor, no carpet, or drywall, electricity, appliance, etc. I can only imagine getting that installed, having a crappy signal that goes out in light cloudiness, AND when they put a washer or dryer, or something else in my LOS. I was disappointed, but no way I'm signing off on a two year commitment on that.amhere said:Can satellite tv signals travel through buildings?
Is it that the satellite tv signals from satellite cannot travel through buildings or is it because the antenna is not able to receive signals that pass through buildings?
I don't know........the bar was about 1/2 way up. He told me he was absolutely shocked he could get a signal at all. That made me balk as well.garys said:The meter is not a percentage, new customers always think it should be higher than it is especially with certain dishes. High 40's into 50's could be excellent. Another factor is that the beam is a lot higher on the dish than most people seem to think it is.
The frequencies used for satellite service are too high, and the power used too low, to go through much of anything other than air. In theory, if you used enough power, you could get the signals through buildings, but that would introduce a whole host of other problems that I think we'd rather not face.amhere said:Can satellite tv signals travel through buildings?
Is it that the satellite tv signals from satellite cannot travel through buildings or is it because the antenna is not able to receive signals that pass through buildings?
Can you tell what are the problems when using high power?sregener said:if you used enough power, you could get the signals through buildings, but that would introduce a whole host of other problems that I think we'd rather not face.
What difference does it make? Do you think they can run a cable up to the satellite to boost the power output of all those transponders? Geez! They are probably outputting all that they can.amhere said:@SayWhat?
I got your point. but can you please tell what are the issues when high power is used?
I just did. Higher power means everything in the beam gets cooked, just like your microwave over.amhere said:I got your point. but can you please tell what are the issues when high power is used?
Imagine you are a hot dog. Put a hot dog in a microwave for 10 minutes. See what happens.amhere said:@SayWhat?
I got your point. but can you please tell what are the issues when high power is used?
Others have addressed this, so I think it's pretty well covered. First issue is that you'd need a lot more power at the satellite - which means the satellite would need much larger solar panels and would be much more expensive. Second issue is radiation - people already walk around with tin foil hats because of all that radiation coming down. Third issue is selectivity - the stronger the signal coming down, the harder it would be to differentiate between orbital slots. That means fewer satellites up there to deliver stuff, which leads to less choices (and more expense) for us Finally, in order to pass through buildings, you would need some way to deal with scatter from the signal bouncing off things in the walls like electrical wire, which means you couldn't really have much directionality at all - one use of each frequency, instead of reusing the same one every 2 degrees over the satellite belt.amhere said:Can you tell what are the problems when using high power?
Is there a web article or something that tells about this?