[steverichmond]

Long story short, I had not yet got the receiver in the kitchen installed up and out of the way and my son spilled a class of milk very close to it. The receive is fine but this got me to thinking. What if it had been damaged in this manner? Would it have been coverd by the protection plan?

Thanks,
Steve

Please pardon this if it has been discussed before.

 

[harsh]

Feeding the receiver is not considered normal wear and tear. For the www challenged, here's the terms and conditions: http://directv.com/learn/pdf/DirecTV_service_contract_v4.pdf

The key phrase is "introduction of foreign objects into the product".

 

[Ken S]

Feeding the receiver is not considered normal wear and tear. For the www challenged, here's the terms and conditions: http://directv.com/learn/pdf/DirecTV_service_contract_v4.pdf

The key phrase is "introduction of foreign objects into the product".

Yes, but what if the milk was from a United States-based cow? :grin:

 

[harsh]

Yes, but what if the milk was from a United States-based cow? :grin:

The receiver was most likely assembled in Mexico or an Asian country, so milk from U.S. cows would still be foreign.

 

[davring]

The receiver was most likely assembled in Mexico or an Asian country, so milk from U.S. cows would still be foreign.

Than soy milk would be acceptable?

 

[curt8403]

Than soy milk would be acceptable?

for porpoises of Joking, yes,
for Porpoises of replacement, NO!