Joined
·
768 Posts
It seems clear from the widely varied experiences people are having with notionally identically hardware and software that how the box is used is a critical factor in reliability.
The box has a network port, right? So not have the box record every remote signal received, and every front panel button press detected, in an activity log? Any time one of the menu reset options was selected, this could be sent to D* over the network.
Now, there are lots of things to work out about this process, like how to tie a box to a user (s/n and access card numbers?) and how to tie a reset to a problem (perhaps a web form to submit your data, with known bugs as radio buttons, a text area for new bugs, and a place to put your box S/N and the date/time of reset and, the first time, your connections, devices, and other "environmental" information).
As with Windows, you could make it an "opt in" deal, either case-by-case, or as a system setting - this would protect people's privacy and ensure that D* didn't get buried in data that would never get tied to a particular error condition.
Seems to me that would dramatically improve the specificity, accuracy, and quantity of data available to figure out what conditions are triggering these issues.
The box has a network port, right? So not have the box record every remote signal received, and every front panel button press detected, in an activity log? Any time one of the menu reset options was selected, this could be sent to D* over the network.
Now, there are lots of things to work out about this process, like how to tie a box to a user (s/n and access card numbers?) and how to tie a reset to a problem (perhaps a web form to submit your data, with known bugs as radio buttons, a text area for new bugs, and a place to put your box S/N and the date/time of reset and, the first time, your connections, devices, and other "environmental" information).
As with Windows, you could make it an "opt in" deal, either case-by-case, or as a system setting - this would protect people's privacy and ensure that D* didn't get buried in data that would never get tied to a particular error condition.
Seems to me that would dramatically improve the specificity, accuracy, and quantity of data available to figure out what conditions are triggering these issues.