Good luck, with what ever choice you make...
I like to think that it will be...soprano_777 said:Thanks Earl I wish there was some assurance that this would be fixed soon but it don,t look that way?
But it is working...junebug said:The development teams should have had the HR20 working before letting people buy it. What a concept - let's sell it and have the first adopters be the alpha testers - and it's better than free, the first adopters will pay for it! That's a lot better financially for DirecTV than paying a third-rate third-world country's engineers to do the testing. Bust.
until it reliably scheduled recordings, and reliably played them back, without crashing.Earl Bonovich said:How long should that have kept it in the lab?
For a lot of people it does not and in your own posts you say "I know the development teams are busting their humps to get this thing fixed", and this is based on your direct contacts with D*, so they know they have problems with the software, and while the bugs may not have presented to all users, they are there, D* knows it, and they are trying to develop software fixes to address them.Earl Bonovich said:But it is working...
And works well for a lot of people... Some since day one.
However, there are issues with it... and no matter how long you would have kept it in the lab... tested it.. ect... it would have had issues when released.
How long should that have kept it in the lab?
Okay... so then they released it when they should have.matto said:until it reliably scheduled recordings, and reliably played them back, without crashing.
Yes... based on my contacts at DirecTV....btmoore said:For a lot of people it does not and in your own posts you say "I know the development teams are busting their humps to get this thing fixed", and this is based on your direct contacts with D*, so they know they have problems with the software, and while the bugs may not have presented to all users, they are there, D* knows it, and they are trying to develop software fixes to address them.
As far as how long it should of been kept in the lab, it is not a question of time, it is a question of quality. You keep the product in the lab until you can develop the test cases to ensure it is stable for your customers and once you decide to release it you also need to be upfront with your known bugs and you communicate to your support staff about those issues, so they can set expectations with your customers.
It also doesn't mean the unit is a POS... it just means that you didn't account for the thousands of thousands of possibilities...matto said:lack of an effective testing methodology doesn't mean your product works.
it means your testing sucks.
Now come on Earl, you cant honestly believe what you are writing, can you? This box has serious issues, that even you have said that D* is actively working to fix. I am not saying that your experience or even others is one of a lower rate of problems, but there is a lot of evidence that there are a lot of problems. These problems are far worse than any other STB I have owned and granted, my experience with DVRs is limited to the SD DTiVos for about 5 years which is where I developed my expectations about the core functionality in a DVR, and my expectations for how software is suppose to work is based on being a computer scientist and an executive in the high tech industry and management consulting fields. So I think I have rather well established foundation for knowing what a solid product is. We are not talking about the box being TiVo like, we are talking about the box making recordings 99.999% of the time and not locking up. It you cant get that working you should not release the product.Earl Bonovich said:Okay... so then they released it when they should have.
As the units I have... do just that.
The units others have... do just that
And if the criteria is... 100% of the units, for 100% of the combinations, for 100% of the users... No DVR would be out in the market... not TiVo.. not UTV.. not cable-co's... none...
Earl, please, take my word for it. I work at a company where software is our only product. We sell software to Fortune 1 companies, telcos, cable ISPs. My job is software release engineering and test automation.Earl Bonovich said:It also doesn't mean the unit is a POS... it just means that you didn't account for the thousands of thousands of possibilities...
If I didn't believe it... I wouldn't write it..btmoore said:Now come on Earl, you cant honestly believe what you are writing, can you? This box has serious issues, that even you have said that D* is actively working to fix. I am not saying that your experience or even others is one of a lower rate of problems, but there is a lot of evidence that there are a lot of problems. These problems are far worse than any other STB I have owned and granted, my experience with DVRs is limited to the SD DTiVos for about 5 years which is where I developed my expectations about the core functionality in a DVR, and my expectations for how software is suppose to work is based on being a computer scientist and an executive in the high tech industry and management consulting fields. So I think I have rather well established foundation for knowing what a solid product is. We are not talking about the box being TiVo like, we are talking about the box making recordings 99.999% of the time and not locking up. It you cant get that working you should not release the product.
I can understand that... and appriciate that..matto said:Earl, please, take my word for it. I work at a company where software is our only product. We sell software to Fortune 1 companies, telcos, cable ISPs. My job is software release engineering and test automation.
I literally do this for a living. Please understand that when I make a comment like my last one, I am not speaking off the cuff, I am speaking as a professional, about an issue where I am paid handsomely to know what I am talking about.
Your repeated "never 100% perfect" argument is a red herring, and both of us know it. The goal before releasing a product is not 100% perfection. It is to ensure that there are little or no customer impacting bugs which affect the basic functionality of the product.
I don't understand why you keep going back to 100% or Perfect out the door. No one is saying that, but what I am saying is it needs to be stable, not lockup or crash and it needs to accurately record 99.999 percent of the time those are not outrageous expectations for a DVR product in the year 2006. The Partial but and unwatchable bugs are a big problem with core functionality not minor issues, because recording and watching the box is why we bought it. It would it be normal for some bug corner cases to be out there that might cause a recording to fail or cause rare lockup, or maybe some kind of mistake like the Dolby having to be turned off to turn on is not that big of a deal. The expectation for a DVR is that it will record and not crash, and this box can not be trusted to do the basic functionality is is supose to support, at lease on this version of the software. We are 6 years later from when the TiVo and other DVRs were released, the functionality is well understood, I have a hard time understanding how this product could be released with so many core functionality bugs. It does not need to be perfect, nothing is perfect, all software and systems have bugs, but it does need to be a lot better than what we now have.Earl Bonovich said:If I didn't believe it... I wouldn't write it..
This unit is HOW old? 3 months? since public release...
Do your really think they would NOT have been working on it at this point?
Why is it so shocking that they are working on it?
I would hope that they are working on it...
How many versions are the of the TiVo software?
They didn't get it right, perfectly right out of the box.
I haven't seen ANY DVR that was perfect out the door... not one, in the 6 years I have been around DVR's.
I apologize... my comments are not to hammer on 100% perfection out of the box. You are having problems are having problems... I am not in one way shape of form trying to discredit that in anyway.btmoore said:I don't understand why you keep going back to 100% or Perfect out the door. No one is saying that, but what I am saying is it needs to be stable, not lockup or crash and it needs to accurately record 99.999 percent of the time those are not outrageous expectations for a DVR product in the year 2006. The Partial but and unwatchable bugs are a big problem with core functionality not minor issues, because recording and watching the box is why we bought it. Would it be normal for some bug corner cases to be out there that might cause a recording to fail or cause rare lockup, or maybe some kind of mistake like the Dolby having to be turned off to turn on is not that big of a deal. The expectation for a DVR is that it will record and not crash, and this box can not be trusted to do the basic functionality is is supose to support, at lease on this version of the software. We are 6 years later from when the TiVo and other DVRs were released, the functionality is well understood, I have a hard time understanding how this product could be released with so many core functionality bugs. It does not need to be perfect, nothing is perfect, all software and systems have bugs, but it does need to be a lot better than what we now have.