Dave_S said:
I have seen some pixelation on mpeg4 ABC-Boston (the station I watch the most) since 0x10b that didn't seem to be there previously. Interestingly enough, I quit watching the HR10 OTA because of the audio drop outs (6.3 issue), now starting to see infrequent pixelation on mpeg4, but not on OTA on the HR20. I haven't noticed it on other channels, or have had time to do a comparison, because I haven't really been watching anything other than the news since all of our favorite shows are in re-runs right now. I have 3 - HR20's (2 component, 1 HDMI) with 0x10b and 2 - HR10's (1 component, 1 HDMI) with 6.3a and have noticed similar results on all boxes. Signal strength is not an issue.
Don't confuse "pixelation" with macroblocking. Normally pixelation is a result of weak or marginal signals. Macroblocking is a result of over-compression or a result of the digital encoder being unable to keep up with the motion on the screen.
Macroblocking is frequently seen on action sports, particularly football where you have close-ups of action. Macroblocking is also common during the 1st second or so after a scene change, again where there is a lot of fine detail.
The problem we're seeing here in Houston with the MPEG-4 locals is absolutely macroblocking from too much compression.
You will also see macroblocking on some of your OTA locals, especially if the broadcaster is multicasting (i.e., running sub channels). These so-called experts will tell you that they can squeeze an HD signal down to 14 Mbps (or less) and for talking heads (i.e., a newscast) or an old movie it looks acceptable. But it does NOT look acceptable during any action sports. However, by reducing the main channel down to 14 Mbps or less it gives them the ability to create sub-channels and sell more advertising. That's what it's all about, selling advertising.
By contrast, if you have OTA available look at a FOX HD broadcast of a NFL game. It's damn near flawless. Why? because FOX does not multicast and thus allocates the entire 19.2 mbps channel bandwidth to their HD signal and the result is gorgeous. FOX also was late to the HD party and so therefore has somewhat newer equipment than stations who have been offering HD for many years. That DOES make a difference.
Here's an
EXCELENT article on the subject, written in terms anyone can understand.
http://www.multichannel.com/index.asp?layout=articlePrint&articleid=CA6400524