I've seen a few threads comparing the HR20 to an (admittedly non-existent) MPEG4 HD Directivo. In these threads some people have stated that they love their HR20 and that they wouldn't give it up for an MPEG4 HD Directivo because of the additional features of the HR20.
I've had the HR20 for around a month now and it's been fine for me. However, as a longtime Directivo owner I've been a little disappointed.
I am honestly curious what the additonal features of the HR20 are? I can think of 2 off the top of my head:
- Much faster in several circumstances (setting up recording especially)
- The 'Active' stuff: weather, interactive mix channels.
Please let me know what I am missing? Specifically, I am looking for the advantages of the HR20 over a hypothetical MPEG4 HD Directivo, over and above what I've already mentioned. I already know the advantages of the reverse comparison.
Please don't flame the HR20 or HR10.
I've had the HR20 for around a month now and it's been fine for me. However, as a longtime Directivo owner I've been a little disappointed.
I am honestly curious what the additonal features of the HR20 are? I can think of 2 off the top of my head:
- Much faster in several circumstances (setting up recording especially)
- The 'Active' stuff: weather, interactive mix channels.
Please let me know what I am missing? Specifically, I am looking for the advantages of the HR20 over a hypothetical MPEG4 HD Directivo, over and above what I've already mentioned. I already know the advantages of the reverse comparison.
Please don't flame the HR20 or HR10.