Well the R15 team is still working on the product, the R15 and HR20 teams are different and have their own people working in each group. Just because the HR20 is getting updates doesn't mean the R15 isn't being worked on. The last release was meant to be a full release I do believe but as you all reported had some big issues and I for one am glad it got pulled.Wolffpack said:I think there has been enough time given. The last real functional update the R15 received was 08/14 in the 10D3 release for the -500 series. We did receive 10E8 the beginning of October but as Earl told us that was an update that only addressed file system issues and didn't fix anything. Part 1 of a 2 Part update and only for the -500 series as the -100s and -300s already had that section of code.
We started getting 10F1 the beginning of November but that update was real slow and was pulled. Some received 10F4 but that was never intended for public consumption and is no longer out there.
So really the R15 hasn't had any bugs fixed or...dare I say.....features added since the beginning of August. That's 4 months guys. The last REAL update we received for the R15 was before the HR20 was released. Does that mean anything to anyone other than me?
Per threads on the HR20 side HD represents anywhere from 10-13% of the DTV customer base. So a product that is used by 13% of DTVs DVR customers seems to be getting 90% of the DVR software development pie.
Earl, any update on our next update?
I hate to defend D*, but HD is the future. I'm sure the HD customer base is expanding rapidly. Eventually, we'll all be there. They also pay more for HD. It's only smart to invest in anything that increases that market share.Wolffpack said:Per threads on the HR20 side HD represents anywhere from 10-13% of the DTV customer base. So a product that is used by 13% of DTVs DVR customers seems to be getting 90% of the DVR software development pie.
So tell me. Can DTV get any of their home grown receivers to work properly? If not, why not go back to the older versions that did work? Is DTV doing the software development/coding on the H20? The D11? If so, seems like I'm seeing a pattern.jonaswan2 said:Wait a minute, but they haven't fixed all of the other DirecTV branded recievers yet (heck, the H20 still doesn't have any interactive capabilities as far as I know). So, the R15 takes first priority. I need to get this straight here.
It has got to be cheaper and easier for them to support by making their own, compared to having 20 different models of recievers from 20 different manufactures. Also, DirecTV probably gets to keep a lot more money from these recievers, so yeah.Wolffpack said:So tell me. Can DTV get any of their home grown receivers to work properly? If not, why not go back to the older versions that did work? Is DTV doing the software development/coding on the H20? The D11? If so, seems like I'm seeing a pattern.
I'm not sure about all of the receivers/DVRs way back, but as far as the HDVR2, SD-DVR40, SD-DVR80 and RCA39 the inerds of those boxes were exactly the same despite being manufactured by different vendors. Aside from the HD size, the power supply, mainboard, chips and front panel were identical and can be swapped between different models. Not at all like the R15-100, -300, -500.jonaswan2 said:It has got to be cheaper and easier for them to support by making their own, compared to having 20 different models of recievers from 20 different manufactures. Also, DirecTV probably gets to keep a lot more money from these recievers, so yeah.