Vip 722 and a Dish 1000.
The 722 is a bit more mature technology than the 612. Theoretically, it should be more stable than the 612 but from what I read here, the 612 seems to perform pretty well. The 722 allows dual buffering, pip, and ability to feed a second signal to a SDtv. You could lower costs by dropping one of the 510 receivers plus have DVR functionality for the HDTV and a SDTV. The dual buffering and pip options are not something that I would use. However, if you're a super sports fanatic, pip and dual buffering allow you to watch two games at one time.reddice said:So what you are saying is that the 612VIP is not okay. I have plenty of hours of recording time with it and I am only using it for one TV.
Also would I only need a Dish 1000. I have one line coming in that has to be split into two and have 3 standard 510 receivers that have to be hooked up.
Count me into that group. I got the 622 first and enjoyed the better quality of the HD feeds as well as the HD only channels. Then I got the HDTV. The 612 is still hooked up to to a 27" (29"?) Sony SDTV. One thing at a time. I sort of justified the 1st HDTV as I use it for TV and the computer monitor. Wireless KB & Mouse to complete the computer setup. KB has encryption of course as it is wireless.Jim5506 said:And you believed her?
The number of TV's you have is none of DishNetworks business. You can lease any DVR you are willing to pay the lease fee for.
I know of persons who put a 622 or 722 on an SD TV set, just because they hadn't bought the HDTV yet.
One thought.reddice said:I been wanted to get a HDTV for a while. I could always afford despite my gripes here it it is just that my Grandmother which is the owner of the house would not let me get one. My old crappy analog TV 27" monstrosity which I still don't know how I am going to take out of my small room with its only RF connector is starting to go so now I can get one. Can't wait to watch all of the primetime network shows in HD. I never viewed HD except for demos at the electronics store.