If native is off, then set your res on the front panel to the res that matches (most closely) the native display resolution of your TV. Typcially those will be:traderfjp said:When the native res. is set to off what becomes the default rez. for SD and HD? Is there another setting somewhere?
To begin with (before you get bored and want to play with a ton of settings)traderfjp said:I have a Sony SXRD. The set upconverts everything to 1080P. Should I leave the native rez. on or off in the HR-20 settings?
Well put.hasan said:To begin with (before you get bored and want to play with a ton of settings)
Try it one of the two following ways:
Turn native mode OFF in the HR20
Set the HR20 output res on the front panel to:
720p (now take a careful look at a variety of video material and see what you think)
then change the HR20 to ouput res on the front panel to:
1080i (now take a careful look at a variety of vide material and see what you think)
Once you decide whether 720p or 1080i looks better when upconverted to 1080p by your TV, leave it set that way.
Some think 720p > 1080p is the best way to go because it stays progressive. Others like matching the resolution, even though at 1080i, you have to convert from interlaced to progressive.
This is crazy, you would never want to output 1080i broadcasts as 720P from any STB if you have a true 1080P display because you will never get 1080 resolution, its LOST FOREVER when the STB converts the 1080i broadcast to 720P. Secondly,hasan said:To begin with (before you get bored and want to play with a ton of settings)
Try it one of the two following ways:
Turn native mode OFF in the HR20
Set the HR20 output res on the front panel to:
720p (now take a careful look at a variety of video material and see what you think)
then change the HR20 to ouput res on the front panel to:
1080i (now take a careful look at a variety of vide material and see what you think)
Once you decide whether 720p or 1080i looks better when upconverted to 1080p by your TV, leave it set that way.
Some think 720p > 1080p is the best way to go because it stays progressive. Others like matching the resolution, even though at 1080i, you have to convert from interlaced to progressive.
I'm not saying I disagree that you will never get a 1080 rez when driving 720P....but how do you figure only a 720/30? out of the settop. The HR20 will provide a 720/60P output conrvesion.JCO said:This is crazy, you would never want to output 1080i broadcasts as 720P from any STB if you have a true 1080P display because you will never get 1080 resolution, its LOST FOREVER when the STB converts the 1080i broadcast to 720P. Secondly,
you DONT GET a real 720P/60 output from the STB when you cross-convert a 1080i broadcast to 720P, it ends up a pseudo 720P30 signal not a real 720P60 signal so there is nothing to be gained by doing that. The best thing to do is use native output and you will get the best of each of the HD formats has to offer, not the worst.
you only get a 720/30 signal from a 1080i/60 cross conversion because 1080i/60 format requires two fields to create a single progressive field. when you convert a 1080i/60 signal to 720p/60 the converter "cheats" and doubles every frame to get 60 for 720/p60. while there are technically 60 progressive frames, since there are two of everthing it looks just the same as 720p/30 would, and wont have the smoothness of true 720P/60 for this reason as there are only 30 different frames per second, not 60.thekochs said:I'm not saying I disagree that you will never get a 1080 rez when driving 720P....but how do you figure only a 720/30? out of the settop. The HR20 will provide a 720/60P output conrvesion.
This is not correct.....when converting to 720P the decoder holds/combines the odd and even fields in the video frame buffer then writes them progressive to the screen in a single 60Hz frame.....else this would be more of a frame based 720i-ish thing you are describing and would look terrible if it existed. The refresh rate to the screen is still 60Hz no matter what. What you are describing is line doubling/replication which no decoders/scalar ICs have done for along time and was primarily used for scaling. They also used to do a similiar function for scaling as well called interpolation....they do not do this either anymore. They now use more intelligent/complex algorythms to scale & filter. There is some other items going on in that there must be some intelligent motion compensation calcs done in this conversion but way too deep for this forum. Suffice to say a 1080i conversion to 720P is not giving you a odd/even frame based effective 30Hz result....it is full 720P/60.JCO said:you only get a 720/30 signal from a 1080i/60 cross conversion because 1080i/60 format requires two fields to create a single progressive field. when you convert a 1080i/60 signal to 720p/60 the converter "cheats" and doubles every frame to get 60 for 720/p60. while there are technically 60 progressive frames, since there are two of everthing it looks just the same as 720p/30 would, and wont have the smoothness of true 720P/60 for this reason as there are only 30 different frames per second, not 60.
What part of "take a look at it and see what you think" didn't you understand? I gave him some options to play with, that's all. If one of them is as bad as you seem to think, then it will get rejected out of hand, will it not?JCO said:This is crazy, you would never want to output 1080i broadcasts as 720P from any STB if you have a true 1080P display because you will never get 1080 resolution, its LOST FOREVER when the STB converts the 1080i broadcast to 720P. Secondly,
you DONT GET a real 720P/60 output from the STB when you cross-convert a 1080i broadcast to 720P, it ends up a pseudo 720P30 signal not a real 720P60 signal so there is nothing to be gained by doing that. The best thing to do is use native output and you will get the best of each of the HD formats has to offer, not the worst.
Sorry Sir - But you are BLATANTLY misinformed. You cannot creat 60 discrete smooth motion frames from a recording that only has 30 and that is what 1080i/60 has. What the 1080i/60 cross conversion to 720P/60 does is double every deinterlaced frame so you get frame 1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4, etc to29,29,30,30 with the final result being 30 frames shown twice each every 60 seconds. It certainly doesnt look horrible, never said that, but its not as smooth as true 720p/60 which gives you 1,2,3,4,5 etc thru 58,59,60 every second. Why is this so difficultthekochs said:This is not correct.....when converting to 720P the decoder holds/combines the odd and even fields in the video frame buffer then writes them progressive to the screen in a single 60Hz frame.....else this would be more of a frame based 720i-ish thing you are describing and would look terrible if it existed. The refresh rate to the screen is still 60Hz no matter what. What you are describing is line doubling/replication which no decoders/scalar ICs have done for along time and was primarily used for scaling. They also used to do a similiar function for scaling as well called interpolation....they do not do this either anymore. They now use more intelligent/complex algorythms to scale & filter. There is some other items going on in that there must be some intelligent motion compensation calcs done in this conversion but way too deep for this forum. Suffice to say a 1080i conversion to 720P is not giving you a odd/even frame based effective 30Hz result....it is full 720P/60.
Man....I hate to re-open this discussion and put my foot in my mouth again but instead of giving my opinion on which is better here is the steps for people to try (I copied Hasan's because good start)
1) If you have high-end 1080P TV and want a set-n-forget setting, and can live with channel/format change delay, put NATIVE ON. This is also true if you feel your TV has much superior scalar than HR20....or you want to use the TV settings to adjust picture. {STOP: Don't Read Further}
2) Find out what your native resoulution of TV is....1280x720, 1368x768, 1920x1080
3) Turn Native mode OFF in the HR20.
4) Make sure 16:9 is set in HR20 as Display Type
5) Make sure on your TV you have set for Full Screen or Full Passthrough....descriptions vary.
6) If you have 1280x720 or 1368x768 native resolution TV set HR20 resolution to 720P only...make sure Format button has you one of these settings. {STOP: Do Not Read Further}
7) If you have 1920x1080 native resolution turn 720P and 1080i only on in HR20....make sure Format button has you on this setting.
8) Now, watch a bunch of material....SD, HBOHD (1080i), Sports (720P), Local HD, OTA HD.....use the Format button on Remote and switch between these formats as you view the material. You can decide to leave on one or the other. Note, since Native is OFF you forcing this format you toggle to be sent to the TV.
This above process should work for everyone since it allows for each user to setup and easily check their preferences.
YES there is, its called "native" and your tv design engineers have alreadyhasan said:What part of "take a look at it and see what you think" didn't you understand? I gave him some options to play with, that's all. If one of them is as bad as you seem to think, then it will get rejected out of hand, will it not?
This discussion has taken place for literally YEARS over in avsforum. The conclusions there are not as simplistic as your "one size fits all" approach. What is going to look best in your particular situation depends on how well the source device and the display device do their respective jobs. The only way to find that out is to try different combinations.
In the beginning, I laid out the easiest ones. Notice my comment about boredom. When one has nothing better to do, a lot more experimenting is in order, if you aren't satisfied, including leaving Native ON in the HR20.
With a new user, I think it is VERY poor advice to tell them to use Native ON, and then have to put up with the slow channel changes...most seem to object to that right away. My advice was to someone new, to get them going and not confuse them with too many variables. If the user is not satisfied, they can then proceed to try other options.
There is no "one answer" formula.
Well, I will most definitely agree with you nothing compares to the origional 1:1 source being decoded and passed through 1:1 to a matching 1:1 native screen rez....nirvana.JCO said:Sorry Sir - But you are BLATANTLY misinformed. You cannot creat 60 discrete smooth motion frames from a recording that only has 30 and that is what 1080i/60 has. What the 1080i/60 cross conversion to 720P/60 does is double every deinterlaced frame so you get frame 1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4, etc to29,29,30,30 with the final result being 30 frames shown twice each every 60 seconds. It certainly doesnt look horrible, never said that, but its not as smooth as true 720p/60 which gives you 1,2,3,4,5 etc thru 58,59,60 every second.
I dont know where you are getting this odd/even non-sense from. When I said the final cross converted 720P/60 signal shows 1,1,2,2,...29,29,30,30, each of those frames are a single frame constructed from an odd and even pair of 1080i fields. the frames in the final cross converted 720p are not odd or even, they are just frames.thekochs said:Well, I will most definitely agree with you nothing compares to the origional 1:1 source being decoded and passed through 1:1 to a matching 1:1 native screen rez....nirvana.
I think you/I disagree on the back-end. The 60 in the 1080i60 is the field not frame refresh rate. I think VideoVeteran made a good point which I'll add in to my response. Your 1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,etc. explanation is fine but it really becomes [1odd,1even], [2odd,2even], [3odd,3even], [4odd,4even], etc. placed into a single frame buffer where motion comp and other filter alogrythms are placed on the new frame (eg. lancosz, etc.). This newly built 1280x720 frame buffer is then displayed on the TV at 60Hz progressively. Thus, the user is seeing a progressive image not a frame interlaced image as your explanation eludes to. Obviously....I'm using a 720P native screen in this example.
Regardless if you/I/others agree on how the conversion/scaling works for those reading I think the process for them to determine their best setting still holds true:
***************************************************************
1) If you have high-end 1080P TV and want a set-n-forget setting, and can live with channel/format change delay, put NATIVE ON. This is also true if you feel your TV has much superior scalar than HR20....or you want to use the TV settings to adjust picture. {STOP: Don't Read Further}
2) Find out what your native resoulution of TV is....1280x720, 1368x768, 1920x1080
3) Turn Native mode OFF in the HR20.
4) Make sure 16:9 is set in HR20 as Display Type
5) Make sure on your TV you have set for Full Screen or Full Passthrough....descriptions vary.
6) If you have 1280x720 or 1368x768 native resolution TV set HR20 resolution to 720P only...make sure Format button has you one of these settings. {STOP: Do Not Read Further}
7) If you have 1920x1080 native resolution turn 720P and 1080i only on in HR20....make sure Format button has you on this setting.
8) Now, watch a bunch of material....SD, HBOHD (1080i), Sports (720P), Local HD, OTA HD.....use the Format button on Remote and switch between these formats as you view the material. You can decide to leave on one or the other. Note, since Native is OFF you forcing this format you toggle to be sent to the TV.
Agreed....that's what my brackets meant...one frame is [1odd,1even]. Where you/I disagree.....and this is my last post...realyJCO said:I dont know where you are getting this odd/even non-sense from. When I said the final cross converted 720P/60 signal shows 1,1,2,2,...29,29,30,30, each of those frames are a single frame constructed from an odd and even pair of 1080i fields. the frames in the final cross converted 720p are not odd or even, they are just frames.
Actually no thats not correct, I missed your earlier mistake, no, its NOT [1odd,1even], [2odd,2even], etc. the ONLY WAY to output the 60 progressive frames per second is to double each of the 30 deinterlaced 1080i/60 frames before the next one isshown so it's actually [1odd,1even], [[1odd,1even], [2odd,2even], [2odd,2even],........ [29odd,29even], [29odd,29even], [30odd,30even], [30odd,30even] for a grand total of 60 frames shown in one second. Hope that clarifies this a little more.thekochs said:Agreed....that's what my brackets meant...one frame is [1odd,1even]. Where you/I disagree.....and this is my last post...realy....is that you say this source is only 30....when the field rate of 1080i60 is 60. I then disagree it is 1,1,2,2,3,3....I say the playback is 1,2,3,4 output at 60Hz.
Anyway....my two cents but it really doesn't matter....most folks will have their own opinion on what looks best to them. ....ala...do you like blonde, brunette, redhead Victoria Secret model. I guess like this subject arguing the details of it really is stupid. With a 1080i HD broadcast and a $4K+ 1920x1080P TV is there really a bad setting ? Anyway....I tried to outline a simple process above for most to just walk through and try and let them make their own choice.
Cheers.....by the way.....I do enjoy the banter....really. :sure:
Look JCO and others, this is not the place to debate all these deep down numbers, please take it to a separate thread or over to AVS where this has been debated for a decade.JCO said:YES there is, its called "native" and your tv design engineers have already
figured out the very best thing to do with all the different possible input resolutions WITH THAT PARTICLAR SET, if you use native then you cant make a big mistake. Sure the set
takes longer to sync to the changes in format rez , but its a small price to pay
rather than watch hours of inferior looking imagery made due to a poor
box setting choice to help speed up channel change sync a second or two.