Not to put too fine a point on it, but in other words, 68% of people with DVRs are being stupid with how they use them.
While the 6% "time shifting" seems low, in fact that which involves primetime shows is a larger number. From a Media Life article related to this new study:DVRs NOW IN OVER ONE-QUARTER OF US HOUSEHOLDS
DVR Owners are Very Happy, but Impact on Total TV Viewing Remains Modest
Durham, NH - September 15, 2008 - New consumer research from Leichtman Research Group, Inc. (LRG) found that 27% of TV households in the United States have at least one Digital Video Recorder (DVR), and 30% of those households have more than one DVR.
DVR owners are very happy with the service - 87% would recommend their DVR service to a friend, and 81% rate their DVR 8-10 on a 10 point scale (with 45% rating the service as 10). Yet recorded viewing is not necessarily the priority in DVR households - 68% of DVR owners say that they usually watch recorded DVR programs when there is nothing on regularly scheduled TV that they want to watch.
These findings are based on a survey of 1,300 households throughout the United States, and are part of LRG's study, On-Demand TV 2008: A Nationwide Study on VOD and DVRs. This is LRG's seventh annual study on this topic.
LRG's research also found that:
* 35% of DVR owners feel that they spend more time watching programs recorded on their DVR than regularly scheduled programs
* 45% of DVR owners record five or fewer programs per week
* 68% of digital cable subscribers say that they have used Video on-Demand - with 85% of this group having used VOD in the past month
* 42% of VOD users are more likely to keep digital cable because of on-Demand
"The number of US households with DVRs has essentially doubled in the past two years, and - with a continued push from cable, DBS, and Telco TV providers - will likely double again over the next four years." said Bruce Leichtman, president and principal analyst for Leichtman Research Group, Inc. "DVRs, along with on-Demand, continue to change the way that many people watch TV. LRG forecasts that DVR and on-Demand's share of total TV viewing time in the US will increase from about 6% today to 16% at the end of 2012."
Last season, about 16 percent of viewing by adults 25-54 in primetime was to time-shifted programs, according to a MediaVest analysis of Nielsen ratings.
Not to put too fine a point on it, but in other words, 68% of people with DVRs are being stupid with how they use them.68% of DVR owners say that they usually watch recorded DVR programs when there is nothing on regularly scheduled TV that they want to watch
I know it sounds stupid but sometimes I just like to find something interesting that's on now. Sometimes I'm bored with the stuff I record.Lee L said:Not to put too fine a point on it, but in other words, 68% of people with DVRs are being stupid with how they use them.
Exactly.Stuart Sweet said:I know it sounds stupid but sometimes I just like to find something interesting that's on now. Sometimes I'm bored with the stuff I record.
Durham is still Nice i work in Madbury next town overStuart Sweet said:Oh, has anyone actually been to Durham NH lately? The last time I visited it, there was a college, and a lot of cows, and not much else. Has it grown?
There is a learning curve for some folks weaning away from mindless channel surfing to finding the actual purpose DVRs serve.Lee L said:Not to put too fine a point on it, but in other words, 68% of people with DVRs are being stupid with how they use them.
Ya I doubt that. Maybe some...and Tivo doesn't make a difference either. People like DVR technology. My parents have 2 HRxx's. I like my 5 dvr's too. People like convienience. They like the trick play functions as much as the recording capabillty. Interesting study. Glad to see more people are using it.rustynails said:"DVR owners are very happy with the service - 87% would recommend their DVR service to a friend..."
These people must be E customers with the VIP 722!![]()
I loaned a TiVo to a couple I know and they were very uncertain going into it. I called a week later and asked how it was going. The husband replied, " I feel like I'm getting some value from paying the cable bill".hdtvfan0001 said:Prior to ever having a DVR (4 HD DVRs ago), I always thought that there was no real benefit to having one.
Then I got my first HD DVR, and haven't looked back since.
I would say I am ten times more likely to watch an "old movie" (i.e. a movie I've seen more than a couple of times) if it is playing in real time than on DVD where I own the movie. Even moreso, I wouldn't DVR the movie at all (other than live pause).Stuart Sweet said:I know it sounds stupid but sometimes I just like to find something interesting that's on now. Sometimes I'm bored with the stuff I record.
Don't have cable, but your post piqued my interest. What is the difference between a cableco dvr & a "real dvr" like a tivo or HRXX? Would you put E*'s in the former or the latter?captain_video said:Several people I know that have DVRs just never got into the habit of using them the way they were meant to be used. Many people are daunted by new technology and tend to avoid using it if there's any kind of a learning curve involved. It's difficult for some people to adjust to the new lifestyle that DVRs offer and still watch their shows during primetime instead of timeshifting. They'll use the DVR for occasional recording but not much else.
What I find interesting in the report is the high level of satisfaction people are claiming for their DVR service. Chances are the ones that are using the cableco DVRs have never used a real DVR before and are just impressed by what they can do ("Look, Honey! It records just like a VCR!"). I'd be willing to bet that if they ever got the chance to use a real DVR like a Tivo or the HRXX models for a reasonable period the satisfaction rating for the cableco DVRs would drop considerably.