Hey all -
LONG time lurker, first time poster. Now have OTA running (thanks Earl!! or should I say thanks "Santa" - although am I the only one to notice that the second test roll out came on the first night of Hanukah? Should we be thanking Hanukah Harry?
) and, thankfully, been bug free.
Question for you all: What would you consider minimum optimal signal strength for locals? During setup, most of them are hitting in the mid 70's range. Only one hits in the 90's. If I adjust my antenna, I can get some to bump up, but I lose strength on others. So, in order not to "rob Peter to pay Paul" the happiest place seems to be where I am right now, where all the signal strengths seem to be in the 70's range.
My pictures seem to be clear and not seeing any overt breakup. So - should I be worrying about this at all? What do I lose by not having signal strengths higher?
Thanks...!
LONG time lurker, first time poster. Now have OTA running (thanks Earl!! or should I say thanks "Santa" - although am I the only one to notice that the second test roll out came on the first night of Hanukah? Should we be thanking Hanukah Harry?
Question for you all: What would you consider minimum optimal signal strength for locals? During setup, most of them are hitting in the mid 70's range. Only one hits in the 90's. If I adjust my antenna, I can get some to bump up, but I lose strength on others. So, in order not to "rob Peter to pay Paul" the happiest place seems to be where I am right now, where all the signal strengths seem to be in the 70's range.
My pictures seem to be clear and not seeing any overt breakup. So - should I be worrying about this at all? What do I lose by not having signal strengths higher?
Thanks...!