November 1 is after the end of October?Earl Bonovich said:Based on the information I got earlier this week, that isn't the case.
OTA is most likely not going to be activated before the end of October.
Some of the recent critical issues took precedence over the OTA.
Now I'm really confused. Isn't Nov 1 after the end of October? Seems like there is a conjunction of the timeframe, not a contradiction?Earl Bonovich said:Based on the information I got earlier this week, that isn't the case.
OTA is most likely not going to be activated before the end of October.
Some of the recent critical issues took precedence over the OTA.
It is possible that even Earl makes a typo.... :lol:hasan said:Now I'm really confused. Isn't Nov 1 after the end of October? Seems like there is a conjunction of the timeframe, not a contradiction?
Are we still on a "late October" time frame based on the information you got earlier this week?
Whatever you can say without compromising your connection, of course.
a giant, well-capitalized typo?lguvenoz said:It is possible that even Earl makes a typo.... :lol:
Hey, I barely know the day of the week some days so I can forgive just about any typo.matto said:a giant, well-capitalized typo?
If Earl stays silent on the issue I would say that it probably is November 1st and this is his subtle, or not so subtle, way of sharing the info without actually saying it.matto said:a giant, well-capitalized typo?
I really HOPE I'm just that thick, and if so, my admiration for Sir Earl has gone up yet another notch!lguvenoz said:If Earl stays silent on the issue I would say that it probably is November 1st and this is his subtle, or not so subtle, way of sharing the info without actually saying it.
I don't even have an OTA feed, I'm more curious about when D* is really going to start delivering all they've promised.....matto said:Have we been reduced to guessing at the meanings of a possible typo?
How in the world can this be considered apropriate customer relations?
The fact that we are expected to rely on info 'leaked' to a third party to know what is going on with our service is absurd to begin with, but this has just sank to new lows.
Mea Culpamatto said:Have we been reduced to guessing at the meanings of a possible typo?
How in the world can this be considered apropriate customer relations?
The fact that we are expected to rely on info 'leaked' to a third party to know what is going on with our service is absurd to begin with, but this has just sank to new lows.
Sorry for the confusion..Earl Bonovich said:Based on the information I got earlier this week, that isn't the case.
OTA is most likely not going to be activated before the end of October.
Some of the recent critical issues took precedence over the OTA.
What are the critical issues that have taken precedence?Earl Bonovich said:Sorry for the confusion..
I was making two statements there.
1) Based on the information I got, OTA will not be turned on on November 1st
2) Based on the information I got, OTA will not be turned on in October either
The recent criticial issues took precedence over the OTA.
Spongeweed said:See guys, I knew this would happen. Everyone complaining. We should have just pretended the hr20 was perfect and we would have OTA by now.![]()
Wait... you mean the Hr20 isn't perfect. I just got off the phone with D* and a CSR assured me that they knew of absolutely no ongoing issues with the HR20. And when I asked about the near weekly software updates, they said "what updates"....Spongeweed said:See guys, I knew this would happen. Everyone complaining. We should have just pretended the hr20 was perfect and we would have OTA by now.![]()
Now look at them yo-yo's, that's the way you do itSpongeweed said:See guys, I knew this would happen. Everyone complaining. We should have just pretended the hr20 was perfect and we would have OTA by now.![]()
Oh, most likely the auto deletion of shows, particularly sports packages, when a signal is not there. OTA with all the crappy stations out there will only magnify this issue.ITrot said:What are the critical issues that have taken precedence?![]()