Sign me up for some of that. :lol:
1 - 8 of 8 Posts
I think Maher is a nut who belongs to the Bill Maher Party. Its pro-vegan, anti-marriage, anti-religion, pro-alternative "medicine", and sometimes borderline libertarian (or is it libertine). Yet he is sympathetic to restricting privacy rights because he's worried about living near the Port of Los Angeles. In other words, it's all about him.Supramom2000 said:
The significant difference between him and O'Reilly is that in the end Maher acknowledges he is a comedian, "a professional entertainer who amuses by relating anecdotes, acting out comical situations, engaging in humorous repartee, etc." (from Dictionary.com). And like most comedians sometimes he's really funny.
I think O'Reilly is a nut who never claims to be a comedian, wants to be taken seriously. and sometimes is unintentionally funny, which makes him an easy target for a comedian.
But that's just my opinion. I think here's a place our opinions diverge?
I think you are correct on our divergence!! But O'Reilly does not lie - that I have found, and he states he is not a newscaster but a commentator. He certainly has his arrogance like most of them. But I don't think it is "all about him" - as evidenced by his passionate work on Jessica's Law.phrelin said:But that's just my opinion. I think here's a place our opinions diverge?
1 - 8 of 8 Posts
