Joined
·
15,556 Posts
So I'm reading about the MPEG4 shift, and finally it dawned no me.
By getting 3 times as many SD channels on each transponder using MPEG4, that would leave a whole bunch of transponders for HD in MPEG4. So if one puts 30 SD channels on one transponder, that would free up two transponders for 10 HD channels. And that's not squeezing the bandwidth.
I was just fiddling with charts when it dawned on me that there's enough room on 110° and 119° for all the current SD plus a whole lot of national HD. Right now all the national HD on 61.5° and 129° could be moved to 110° and 119° if all the boxes were MPEG4 capable.
And since replacing boxes is going to happen slowly anyway, why not speed it up as getting more satellites for more transponders isn't exactly cheap. So it makes good financial sense to trade out MPEG2 only boxes and discontinue MPEG2 service.
Do I have it right? And how much leverage does an owner for two 508's have?:sure:
By getting 3 times as many SD channels on each transponder using MPEG4, that would leave a whole bunch of transponders for HD in MPEG4. So if one puts 30 SD channels on one transponder, that would free up two transponders for 10 HD channels. And that's not squeezing the bandwidth.
I was just fiddling with charts when it dawned on me that there's enough room on 110° and 119° for all the current SD plus a whole lot of national HD. Right now all the national HD on 61.5° and 129° could be moved to 110° and 119° if all the boxes were MPEG4 capable.
And since replacing boxes is going to happen slowly anyway, why not speed it up as getting more satellites for more transponders isn't exactly cheap. So it makes good financial sense to trade out MPEG2 only boxes and discontinue MPEG2 service.
Do I have it right? And how much leverage does an owner for two 508's have?:sure: