A 4-way feeding another 4-way isn't your best option, because of the combined loss.johnssc1 said:
Replacing the current 4-way, with a 2-way that feeds two 4-ways is better, as this is very close to being one 8-way.
A 4-way feeding another 4-way isn't your best option, because of the combined loss.johnssc1 said:Please help me with this before I start removing drywall!
I have a SWM With a 4 port splitter. The PI is after the splitter. 2 ports are used.
If I take a third port, then add a 4 way splitter, and connect 3 outlets to this, will I get #1 or #2?
#1. All three outlets will show the same channel, even with three boxes
#2. All three outlets can be controlled by different boxes, and show different channels.
Both are acceptable, but I would like to know the outcome beforehand!
Thanks
The two sets that are connected now run from an exterior splitter right into the house (~20 ft). The other line wraps a tortous path to the other side of the house, and may be over 100 ft long if stretched!Stuart Sweet said:Seems like you need 5 lines, I'd recommend a 2 way with one line going to the furthest receiver, and the other line to a 4-way, but really there are a lot of ways to do it depending on how far the cable runs are.
This would be best connected to one leg of a 2-way and then use a 4-way on the other leg to feed the short runs.johnssc1 said:The two sets that are connected now run from an exterior splitter right into the house (~20 ft). The other line wraps a tortous path to the other side of the house, and may be over 100 ft long if stretched!