I'll say first that I am extremely satisfied with the Harmony 880. Nothing in this world is perfect but this is easily the best universal remote I've handled, and I've had a few. PM me if you want more info.Brantel said:Before I drop almost 2 bills on a remote, those that have the Harmony 880, does it work all the functions of the HR20 including the functions that are triggered by extended key presses on the factory remote?
lamontcranston said:I'll say first that I am extremely satisfied with the Harmony 880. Nothing in this world is perfect but this is easily the best universal remote I've handled, and I've had a few. PM me if you want more info.
I second this, I just got my HR20 (from an HR10-250) and it was a breeze to reconfigure. I love it.
I actually love the Harmony 880 more now with the HR20 than I did with the HR10. I didn't even care for it too much before. With the HR10, there was such a lag with the response. I was thinking of returning it because the "Down" direction with the 'ring' would work every 7th press.gbubar said:I agree with all the kudos for the 880. I like it so much I have two (one for my office and one for the living room)![]()
![]()
![]()
I'm a proud owner of a 676 (under $100) and it works like a charm as other have reported.Brantel said:Before I drop almost 2 bills on a remote, those that have the Harmony 880, does it work all the functions of the HR20 including the functions that are triggered by extended key presses on the factory remote?
Like "Radio Enginerd", I also have the 676. In my opinion, it's much better than the 880 for the following reasons:bagleyb said:I have the 880, and hate it. It was extremely easy to setup, and works as advertised, however I hate the layout of it. I find it hard to use one handed. In fact, I haven't used it in months. If the numbers were at the top instead of the bottom, It would be my only remote. With the number pad all the way at the bottom, it's become just a paper weight for me.