I would agree this forum has it's share of HR20 defenders and those who are fed up with it... Personally, I believe D* should not have released this box without working out more of the bugs - so when someone posts a negative experience I don't mind - after all we are paying >$50/month for D* service and that service should work with the H20 as well as it has with their other hardware. Having said that, I also don't mind when someone responds that they have no problems - it helps quantify the anomalies.
I think it's unfortunate that some feel the need to bash users who post their negative experiences. IMHO, if you box is flawless, good for you, start a thread and let everyone comment on it. If someone posts their negative experiences, try to real in the urge to call them whiny or mislead - it brings no value to the topic.
As to this being a cult... I am very grateful to Earl's for his contributions to the forum. He tries (and succeeds for the most part) in giving an objective viewpoint with lots of valuable 'intelligence' we would not usually have access to. But some of you who shall go unnamed have clearly crossed the line and defined yourselves as sycophants. I would like to sincerely thank Earl for his time, patience, and effort, but he's no deity and his 'opinions' are as good as/no better then anyone else's'.
For my part, I have had my share of issues with the HR20 (I'm on my 3rd). I've very pleased with D* releasing so many firmware upgrades, it shows they're working on the problems - sometimes we've gone back a step, but ever since the 0xE3 upgrade my box has been much more stable (I've still had to reboot twice and missed two shows since, but that's a huge improvement). I think the majority of my issues are related to MPEG4 signals now. And I would 'like' to think that those of us who have posted their experiences here have contributed to quantifying the problems and assisted D* with making improvements.