DBSTalk Forum banner
1 - 18 of 18 Posts

· New Member
Joined
·
2 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Hello,

I hope someone can help answer this question about QAM compatible receivers. I've posted this question on the Dish Network website. It got forwarded to a different department and never did get answered. This is very disheartening because I bought a 211k the first time and it didn't work.

I am in a Multi Dwelling building and we use QAM for our service. I have a VIP722 that works beautifully. So much so that I ordered myself one more for the bedroom. Unfortunately what I received was a VIP722k. It does not detect my Q-boxes. Is the VIP722k QAM compatible? And if not, is there an add-on I can order to make it so? I'm also wondering if I need to get the receiver programmed first.

I brought my vip722 to the bedroom and I had a live cable line. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks.
 

· Mr. FixAnything
Joined
·
28,094 Posts
Stewart Vernon said:
Did you read the guy's post? He mentioned that his 722K isn't connecting to his Q-box... but he has a 722 that is connecting fine.

Would the 722K connect any differently than a 722?
I did read your post:
The 722K doesn't even have an OTA tuner... they made that an optional module for the 722K. I can't remember if they made a QAM module for the 722K or not.
and did reply.

Can you explain what is in your post ?
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
21,658 Posts
My post was specifying a known difference in a 722K vs a 722. Without knowing how the 722 connects to a Q-box, I wondered if it had anything to do with the fact that the OTA tuner module had become optional on the 722K.

If, as P Smith says, the Q-box connects directly to the SAT inputs... then I don't know why a 722K wouldn't work exactly the same as a 722. Since P Smith seems to know more about it, I hope he can provide more helpful info.
 

· EKB Editor
Joined
·
4,022 Posts
The Q-Box remodulates a QAM-modulated signal as QPSK so other satellite receivers can decode it. The Q-Box can be used with models 211, 411, 522, 622, 625, 722.

EKB: MDU and TechPortal: Q-Box
 

· New Member
Joined
·
2 Posts
Discussion Starter · #11 ·
Hi Stewart,

Thanks for the input. I was sort of hoping that it would be an "easy" fix like ordering an OTA Tuner but I'm beginning to think that the VIP722k just isn't qam compatible. Which sucks because I ordered it off of amazon.com and it was advertised as a 722. I never bothered sending it back because I figured eventually I would get it to work. That was over a year ago.

Anyways, the difference between the two is that as soon as I power the 722 on it will detect the q-box, and run me through the QAM setup. The 722k does not detect my two q-boxes and will instead try and perform a regular Check Switch scan and will not detect any satellites.

I suppose my next step is to put this receiver in the corner and try and find one of these: "The Q-Box can be used with models 211, 411, 522, 622, 625, 722".
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
21,658 Posts
I don't know how receivers are activated in the MDU setups... normally a Dish receiver has to be activated before it can view most channels beyond the "free" ones.

I wonder if a non-activated receiver will not work in a QAM environment? I guess I'm wondering if there's something that needs to be done to authorize the 722K to work on the QAM feed.

Also, as P Smith suggests, it could be you need a firmware update... though I don't know how you would get the firmware update since that comes through satellite connection (which you don't have) or the QAM setup that your receiver isn't recognizing!

It might be that a 722K "could" work with QAM if it had proper firmware pre-installed. A call to Dish might help, but I know from experience that it might be tough to get through to a person who knows the details.

I wonder if any of our Dish reps (DiRT) here might be able to shed more light on whether or not a 722K is compatible with a MDU setup.
 
1 - 18 of 18 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top